A Simulation Analysis of Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of Group Technology Cellular Layouts

Abstract

Group Technology (GT) is a multi-faceted approach to batch production that includes the reconfiguration of plant equipment from a functional layout to a series of product-oriented layouts that are referred to as manufacturing cells. The cells are dedicated to process families of parts that have similar machine operations. The purported benefits of GT over traditional functional layouts range from reduced work-in-process inventory and throughput times to increased worker satisfaction and productivity. However, recent simulation studies challenge some of these claims of superior performance for cellular layouts. This research examines the influence that factors in a firm's operating environment have on the performance of cellular layouts. A simulation model using hypothetical shop data is used to compare a process layout to a cellular layout using mean throughput time and mean level of work-in-process inventory as performance measures. The operating variables analyzed are (1) the ratio of setup to process time, (2) transfer time of material between work centers, (3) demand stability, and (4) the flow of work within cells. None of the individual changes in levels of operating variables produced a clear advantage for cellular layouts. However, the results from these experiments were used to postulate an "ideal" environment for cellular layouts. This environment is characterized as having a high ratio of setup to process time, stable demand, unidirectional flow of work within a cell, and a substantial level of material movement times between process departments. When all of these conditions are present, the cellular layout outperforms the process layout on both performance measures.group technology, plant design, simulation

A two-layer genetic algorithm for the design of reliable cellular manufacturing systems

“…Conventional manufacturing paradigms (Job shop and Flow shop) have found it difficult to satisfy the competitive advantages as well as control and improve the manufacturing efficiency (Wemmerlov & Hyer, 1989;Wemmerlov & Johnson, 1997;Askin, 1999;Das et al, 2007b). Although advantages of the cellular manufacturing systems are properly addressed by either users or researchers, some others have criticized about drawbacks of these systems (Flynn & Jacobs, 1986;Morris & Tersine, 1990;Boughton & Arokiam, 2000;Agarwal & Sarkis, 1998;Das et al, 2007b). Their results can be summarized as below: (Das et al, 2007b), (Seifoddini and Djassemi, 2001;Das et al, 2007b).…”

Simulation Based Decision Support System For Cut-To-Size Plants

“…As an extension, the in-plant distribution as well as the supply chain on the distribution side is included in the simulation model (Phelbs et al 2000;Phelbs et al 2001). Besides that, a number of articles report simulation studies in order to find optimal layouts for flexible manufacturing facilities (Drake et al 1995;Zhou and Venkatesh 1999;Azadivar and Wang 2000;Aleisa and Lin 2005) or cellular manufacturing layouts (Morris and Tersine 1990;Irizarry et al 2001). These approaches mostly aim at the (near) optimal solution of a specific problem rather than evaluating a multidimensional scenario like the assessment of feasibility for a future manufacturing plant projection.…”

Scheduling flexible flow lines with sequence-dependent setup times

“…Following Morris and Tersine (1990), the mean of the processing times can take on one of two values: Hp=fisOt Hp = lO^s-The range of processing times is set at either…”