2017 Wireless Days 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wd.2017.7918134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified widely linear iterative equalizer for SC-FDE systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For other values of SNR and block size there is also a performance advantage when using WL equalization. Future developments of this work could include a performance evaluation using multiple hydrophones in the receiver [17] and/or using iterative widely linear frequency domain equalization [18]. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been partially sponsored by CNPq (Brazil).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other values of SNR and block size there is also a performance advantage when using WL equalization. Future developments of this work could include a performance evaluation using multiple hydrophones in the receiver [17] and/or using iterative widely linear frequency domain equalization [18]. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been partially sponsored by CNPq (Brazil).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simplify this process we assume, as in [9], that we have ideal feedback after the first iteration. With this, we have to C sŝ = Cŝŝ = Cŝ s = σ 2 s I N , C rŝ = C rs and Cŝ r = C sr .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, immediately after the first iteration the feedforward filter is switched to the matched filter. Note that the difference between the equalizer that takes into account the channel estimation errors and the one presented in [10] is the presence of the channel estimation error variances σ 2 e and σ 2 ie in (9). If both are equal to zero, we have the conventional SIMO IB-DFE equalizer seen in [10], i.e., H e = H ie = 0 N .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZF equalization directly uses the inverse matrix of the channel impulse response matrix as the filter coefficient, which is small in computation and low in complexity. However, when the channel has deep fading Electronics 2022, 11, 3397 2 of 13 poles, the noise increases, and the equalization performance decreases [11]. The purpose of MMSE is to optimize the mean square error to the minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%