2017
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.236.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Stabilizer ZX-calculus

Abstract: The stabilizer ZX-calculus is a rigorous graphical language for reasoning about quantum mechanics. The language is sound and complete: a stabilizer ZX-diagram can be transformed into another one if and only if these two diagrams represent the same quantum evolution or quantum state. We show that the stabilizer ZX-calculus can be simplified, removing unnecessary equations while keeping only the essential axioms which potentially capture fundamental structures of quantum mechanics. We thus give a significantly s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conjecture that all the axioms in Figure 1 are necessary. Indeed, in [1], nearly all the rules for Clifford -i.e. all of the axioms in Figure 1 except (E) and (EU)-are proven to be necessary, and all arguments stand here: -(S): It is the only axiom that can transform a node of degree four or higher into a diagram containing lower-degree nodes -(I g ) or (I r ): These are the only two axioms that can transform a diagram with nodes connected to a boundary to a node-free diagram -(CP): It is the only axiom that can transform a diagram with two connected outputs into one with two disconnected outputs -(HD): The necessity of this axiom requires a non-trivial interpretation given in [15,17], and given again in the Appendix at page 15.…”
Section: On Minimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conjecture that all the axioms in Figure 1 are necessary. Indeed, in [1], nearly all the rules for Clifford -i.e. all of the axioms in Figure 1 except (E) and (EU)-are proven to be necessary, and all arguments stand here: -(S): It is the only axiom that can transform a node of degree four or higher into a diagram containing lower-degree nodes -(I g ) or (I r ): These are the only two axioms that can transform a diagram with nodes connected to a boundary to a node-free diagram -(CP): It is the only axiom that can transform a diagram with two connected outputs into one with two disconnected outputs -(HD): The necessity of this axiom requires a non-trivial interpretation given in [15,17], and given again in the Appendix at page 15.…”
Section: On Minimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we just said, a first and easy step to do is to show that we can recover the rules that are known to make the language complete for Clifford [1]. This will allow us to freely use in the following all the equations of the π 2 -fragment that are sound.…”
Section: Cliffordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ZX-calculus has a rich equational theory based on the theory of Frobenius-Hopf algebras [7,10]. Various axiomatisations have been proposed ( [12,13,5,23,16,22]) with various advantages and drawbacks. Here we adopt the scheme of Backens [3] which is clean, concise, and adequate for the treatment of the Clifford group.…”
Section: The Zx-calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will do so too here, since this makes that the rules of the ZXcalculus appear much simpler (see e.g. [5] for a presentation of the ZX-calculus rules with explicit scalars that make equations hold on-the-nose). Due to the diagrammatic underpinning, in addition to the rules given below, there is one meta-rule that ZX-calculus obeys, namely:…”
Section: Background 2: Zx-calculus Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%