A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers

Saengkanuk, Araya; Nuchadomrong, Suporn; Jogloy, Sanun; Patanothai, A.; Srijaranai, Supalax

doi:10.1007/s00217-011-1552-3

Cited by 84 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inulin content was analyzed using the methods described by Saengkanuk et al (2011). Briefly, the tubers were longitudinally sliced into thin pieces at the middle part of the tubers.…”

Section: Inulin Content and Inulin Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation of inulin content, inulin yield and water use efficiency for inulin yield in Jerusalem artichoke genotypes under different water regimes

Puangbut

Jogloy

Vorasoot

et al. 2015

Agricultural Water Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Inulin content was analyzed using the methods described by Saengkanuk et al (2011). Briefly, the tubers were longitudinally sliced into thin pieces at the middle part of the tubers.…”

Section: Inulin Content and Inulin Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation of inulin content, inulin yield and water use efficiency for inulin yield in Jerusalem artichoke genotypes under different water regimes

Puangbut

Jogloy

Vorasoot

et al. 2015

Agricultural Water Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…After cooling, the solutions were kept in plastic bottles until analysis by spectrophotometer. Fructose was determined by spectrophotometer using periodate reaction (Saengkanuk et al, 2011). Inulin content was based on fructose measurement, ignoring trace amounts of glucose and reducing free fructose, glucose, and sucrose.…”

Section: Rwc Saturated Dry Weightmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of water regimes on inulin content and inulin yield of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance

Aduldecha¹,

Kaewpradit²,

Vorasoot³

et al. 2016

Turk J Agric For

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drought is a major problem for Jerusalem artichoke production in rainfed areas, as it reduces inulin accumulation in tubers (Conde et al., 1991;Schittenhelm, 1999;Monti et al., 2005). Under rainfed conditions, drought greatly reduced stalk dry weight, tuber dry weight, sugar yield, and inulin yield of Jerusalem artichoke, and differential responses of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes to drought for these characters were observed (Kocsis et al., 2007(Kocsis et al., , 2008. A supply of 50% of the water requirement reduced tuber yield by 20% (Conde et al., 1991) and 22.8% (Losavio et al., 1997). Among inulin-containing and sugar-containing crops, Jerusalem artichoke is more susceptible to water stress than sugar beet or root chicory (Schittenhelm, 1999).

show abstract

“…If analysis could not be undertaken immediately, the samples were stored at 4°C in plastic bottles. Fructose was determined by spectrophotometry using periodate reaction (Saengkanuk et al 2011). Inulin content was calculated based on fructose, ignoring trace amount of glucose and reducing free fructose, glucose and sucrose.…”

Section: Sample Preparation and Analysis Of Inulin Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sample preparation and inulin analysis has been reported previously (Saengkanuk et al 2011). Briefly, the tubers were sliced longitudinally into thin pieces at the middle of the tubers.…”

Section: Sample Preparation and Analysis Of Inulin Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genotypic variability and genotype by environment interactions for inulin content of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic variations in germplasm and genotype 9 environment interaction (G 9 E) are important for crop improvement. The objectives were to explore genetic variation in Jerusalem artichoke germplasm and to evaluate G 9 E interaction for inulin content. Seventy-nine accessions of Jerusalem artichoke were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with two replications for three seasons. Significant variation in inulin content (55.3-74.0% dry weight) was observed and the genotypes with high inulin content could be identified although there was intermediate G 9 E interaction. Genotypes were also significantly different for days to maturity, fresh tuber yield, biomass and harvest index and G 9 E interactions for these traits were also significant. The correlation between inulin content and days to maturity was not significant (r = -0.20), whereas inulin content and fresh tuber yield were significantly associated (r = 0.22). JA 37 and CN 52867 are promising for high yield and inulin content.

show abstract

A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers

Cited by 84 publications

References 33 publications

Variation of inulin content, inulin yield and water use efficiency for inulin yield in Jerusalem artichoke genotypes under different water regimes

Variation of inulin content, inulin yield and water use efficiency for inulin yield in Jerusalem artichoke genotypes under different water regimes

Effects of water regimes on inulin content and inulin yield of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance

Genotypic variability and genotype by environment interactions for inulin content of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About