2000
DOI: 10.1106/01kc-gjdp-h7tw-9m1h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Model for Plain Woven Fabrics

Abstract: A simplified model for studying the behavior of plain woven fabrics is presented. The model consists of two plate elements including a thin layer of matrix between them. Hierarchic shape functions are employed to characterize the initially curved profile of the yarns and the displacements of the plate elements. The plate model is used in conjunction with a simple micro-model which accounts for the material nonlinear response and damage of the yams. The behavior of plain woven fabrics under inplane tension, com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the disclosures in previous works [16]: the Mosaic model should give an upper bound solution of the one-dimensional undulation model, the two-dimensional undulation parallel-series model and the two-dimensional undulation series-parallel model due to the fact that crimp is ignored. From Table 3, it is interesting to notice that for EW220 and E-glass [22] laminate, the predictions of modified curved beam model presented in this paper are less than those of mosaic model (this appears to have a good agreement with the argument in the literature [16]), whereas, for other samples, modified beam model predicts E values higher than mosaic model. In fact, all mosaic model, one-dimensional undulation model and two-dimensional undulation model were derived from the classic laminate theory by ignoring the interaction of orthogonal interlacing strands.…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Comparison Between Predictions Asupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent with the disclosures in previous works [16]: the Mosaic model should give an upper bound solution of the one-dimensional undulation model, the two-dimensional undulation parallel-series model and the two-dimensional undulation series-parallel model due to the fact that crimp is ignored. From Table 3, it is interesting to notice that for EW220 and E-glass [22] laminate, the predictions of modified curved beam model presented in this paper are less than those of mosaic model (this appears to have a good agreement with the argument in the literature [16]), whereas, for other samples, modified beam model predicts E values higher than mosaic model. In fact, all mosaic model, one-dimensional undulation model and two-dimensional undulation model were derived from the classic laminate theory by ignoring the interaction of orthogonal interlacing strands.…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Comparison Between Predictions Asupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There are four sets of experiments to verify the validation of modified model, with three sets of data from the literature [22,23] and one set from new experimental data generated in this work. In the literature [22,23], three sets of experimental moduli of E-glass/epoxy and T300/epoxy being 19.3 GPa, 14.5 GPa and 60.3 GPa, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Comparison Between Predictions Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations