“…These results are consistent with the disclosures in previous works [16]: the Mosaic model should give an upper bound solution of the one-dimensional undulation model, the two-dimensional undulation parallel-series model and the two-dimensional undulation series-parallel model due to the fact that crimp is ignored. From Table 3, it is interesting to notice that for EW220 and E-glass [22] laminate, the predictions of modified curved beam model presented in this paper are less than those of mosaic model (this appears to have a good agreement with the argument in the literature [16]), whereas, for other samples, modified beam model predicts E values higher than mosaic model. In fact, all mosaic model, one-dimensional undulation model and two-dimensional undulation model were derived from the classic laminate theory by ignoring the interaction of orthogonal interlacing strands.…”