1984
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(84)90023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified method for assessing wind-induced fatigue damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of approximate and fast fatigue damage estimation in the design phase of structures is not new, and simplified methods for assessing wind‐induced fatigue damage have already been used for buildings as well as for offshore structures some decades ago. More recent work on wind turbines has focused on the prediction of actual loading curves, e.g., in the study of Manuel and Veers , limited to a wind speed range between 15 and 19 m/s.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The idea of approximate and fast fatigue damage estimation in the design phase of structures is not new, and simplified methods for assessing wind‐induced fatigue damage have already been used for buildings as well as for offshore structures some decades ago. More recent work on wind turbines has focused on the prediction of actual loading curves, e.g., in the study of Manuel and Veers , limited to a wind speed range between 15 and 19 m/s.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…From ( 13), a maximum amplitude of 77.1 kN m due to alongwind and 58.9 kN m due to acrosswind loads is obtained, while a far smaller static alongwind base reaction moment My equal to 5.8 kN m is predicted using (6). This indicates that the effect of fluctuating wind actions on the tower stress/strain field is preponderant with respect to that exerted by the static alongwind action.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of the Wind Tower: Estimation Of The Bas...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although many papers dealt in the past with wind-induced fatigue [6][7][8][9][10][11] and recently the Eurocode 1 [12] codified the first method to take it into account in the design of structures exposed to wind actions, the strength prediction of wind towers is difficult, for a number of reasons. First, because cracks can initiate at different points, including the base flange-to-column weld, the handhold detail and the anchor rods [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16), (19), (24) and (33) can be rewritten as: (41) in which it is proposed to assumeD = 0.22,L = 0.033.…”
Section: Closed Form Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patel and Freathy [19] and Wyatt [20,21] adopted a time-domain approach and semi-empirical formulae to consider the combined effects of the quasi-static and resonant parts of the wind-induced response, assuming that the fatigue curve is a straight line on a log-log scale. Holmes [22] analyzed the alongwind-induced fatigue and derived two closed form solutions that represent, respectively, an upper and a lower bound of the mean total damage: the first was obtained representing the stress process as a narrow band; the second was related to the lower bound of the damage correction factor due to Wirshing and Light [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%