1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00076-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified CT-based definition of the lymph node levels in the node negative neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nodal distribution in the current atlases has been built by compiling different data from gross anatomical, histological, and imaging studies, as well as from conventional atlas books of human anatomy (Rouviére, 1948). Most atlases represent the compiled data on CT crosssections, since CT is the preferred imaging modality to define the target volume for treatment, such as in radiation therapy (Richter and Feyerabend, 1991;Martinez-Monge et al, 1999;Nowak et al, 1999;Wijers et al, 1999;Kiricuta, 2001;Grégoire et al, 2003;Levendag et al, 2004). Crosssections from recent CT-based atlases are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Current Lymphatic Atlasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nodal distribution in the current atlases has been built by compiling different data from gross anatomical, histological, and imaging studies, as well as from conventional atlas books of human anatomy (Rouviére, 1948). Most atlases represent the compiled data on CT crosssections, since CT is the preferred imaging modality to define the target volume for treatment, such as in radiation therapy (Richter and Feyerabend, 1991;Martinez-Monge et al, 1999;Nowak et al, 1999;Wijers et al, 1999;Kiricuta, 2001;Grégoire et al, 2003;Levendag et al, 2004). Crosssections from recent CT-based atlases are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Current Lymphatic Atlasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the precise contouring of primary H&N tumors that is often difficult, the accurate, reproducible and time-efficient contouring of elective nodal risk regions represents an even greater challenge. The tentative to implement lymph nodes levels segmentation in the clinical environment were initially based on the translation of the surgical lymph nodes levels to CT-based regions which meant meticulous segmentation of each CT regions on each slice of the planning CT scan, a laborious process that was considered as incompatible with a routine clinical practice [1]. Indeed, experienced H&N cancer specialists generally spend several hours to fully contour and refine desired targets for a single H&N IMRT case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A corresponding nodal level classifi cation system based upon landmarks readily identifi able on axial imaging was subsequently proposed by Som et al ( 1999 ). The application of this classifi cation system toward CTV delineation in the neck has been extensively described and has been integrated into multinational cooperative group consensus panel guidelines, summarized in Table 4.2 (Gregoire et al 2000 ;Gregoire and Levendag ;Nowak et al 1999 ;Wijers et al 1999 ) and available online at http://www.rtog.org/corelab/ contouringatlases/hn.aspx . Gregoire et al recently published an extensive review of the literature on the risk of metastases to each neck level, with accompanying elective nodal coverage recommendations by primary tumor site (Gregoire et al 2000 ).…”
Section: Defi Ning the Nodal Levels At Risk In The Neckmentioning
confidence: 99%