1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(97)00057-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified chromatographic method for quantitative determination of coenzyme Q10 in dog plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination method was established by improving the extraction recoveries. [5][6][7] The uses of methanol to precipitate protein in plasma and n-hexane to extract the CoQ 10 and CoQ 9 improved the extraction efficiency. CoQ 10 and the internal standard CoQ 9 are unstable under the light, thus all the samples were wrapped with aluminium foil and treatments were carried out under the illumination of yellow light or in the dark.…”
Section: Disscusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination method was established by improving the extraction recoveries. [5][6][7] The uses of methanol to precipitate protein in plasma and n-hexane to extract the CoQ 10 and CoQ 9 improved the extraction efficiency. CoQ 10 and the internal standard CoQ 9 are unstable under the light, thus all the samples were wrapped with aluminium foil and treatments were carried out under the illumination of yellow light or in the dark.…”
Section: Disscusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative determination of CoQ 10 in the solventextracted plasma without any purification was found unsuitable for routine determinations according to some authors [11,18] owing to the large solvent front, the dirty injected sample and the short column lifetime. TLC [14] had been used as an effective tool to purify the extraction of plasma, but a poor recovery and accuracy were obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many analytical methods have been reported for quantitative determination of CoQ 10 in human plasma [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], such as spectrophotometric [5,6], voltammetric [7] and chemiluminescent [8]. Among these publications, the most popular tools used for assaying are HPLC [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], because of the complexity of biological fluid specimens, they usually required samples purified before injection. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) and solid phase extraction (SPE) pretreatment method have been described in several literatures [11][12][13][14], those manual purification methods are time and money consuming, unsuitable for routine determination, especially for clinical chemistry laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many analytical procedures have been reported to quantify CoQ 10 in biosamples: HPLC with ultraviolet detection (UV; Vadhanavikit et al, 1984;Grossi et al, 1992;Kommuru et al, 1998;Lu et al, 2003;Jiang et al, 2004;Karpinska et al, 2006;Li et al, 2006;Hatanaka et al, 2008;Balakrishnan et al, 2009;Paliakov et al, 2009), HPLC with electrochemical detection (ECD; Edlund, 1988;Okamoto et al, 1988;Yamashita and Yamamoto. 1997;Menke et al, 2000;Tang et al, 2001Tang et al, , 2004Mosca et Galinier et al, 2004;Miles et al, 2008), and LC coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) (Hansen et al, 2004;Li et al, 2008;Prosek et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%