2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2012.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified approach to the band gap correction of defect formation energies: Al, Ga, and In-doped ZnO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, it is assumed that only Al Zn is effective as a stable n‐type shallow donor in a 1+ charge state. The contribution of interstitial Al dopants to the conductivity in AZO is still highly questioned . Avandhut et al excluded these defects as a source of doping in ZnO using solid‐state NMR measurements and DFT calculations .…”
Section: Transport Processes In Znomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is assumed that only Al Zn is effective as a stable n‐type shallow donor in a 1+ charge state. The contribution of interstitial Al dopants to the conductivity in AZO is still highly questioned . Avandhut et al excluded these defects as a source of doping in ZnO using solid‐state NMR measurements and DFT calculations .…”
Section: Transport Processes In Znomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, the opposite is the case and the GZO samples exhibit the highest shift except for the AZO-4 film, in which the (002) texture was lost. The behavior of the other AZO films can be explained considering that Al is much more prone to occupy interstitial sites [24], which tend to expand the crystal lattice by pushing their nearest neighbors. Another explanation can be that Al is partly incorporated through the formation of secondary phases [25,26].…”
Section: Dopant Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54][55][56] However, recent progress in DFT shows that defect states can be more accurately described with hybrid functionals, such as the (atomic) self-interaction corrected functional (SIC or ASIC) or the Heyd, Scuseria, and Ernzerhof (HSE) functional. [56][57][58][59][60][61][62] These approaches can accurately account for the self-interaction correction, which not only act upon the levels on which U is applied but on the whole electronic structure. Hence, more accurate defect states are expected from such types of calculations.…”
Section: Interaction Of O Vacancies With LImentioning
confidence: 99%