2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified and fast computational finite element model for the nonlinear load-displacement behaviour of reinforced concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that the behavior of a reinforced concrete element subjected to traction follows three main phases ( Figure 2), namely a linear elastic phase (branch OA), an inelastic cracked phase (branch AC) and an elastic cracked phase (CB) [7,8].  At crack stabilization (Stage IIb) or during crack propagation when the total introduction length cannot develop, the main values are calculated and noted (or ) for steel and (or ) for concrete.…”
Section: Behavior Law Adapted For Fictitious Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is assumed that the behavior of a reinforced concrete element subjected to traction follows three main phases ( Figure 2), namely a linear elastic phase (branch OA), an inelastic cracked phase (branch AC) and an elastic cracked phase (CB) [7,8].  At crack stabilization (Stage IIb) or during crack propagation when the total introduction length cannot develop, the main values are calculated and noted (or ) for steel and (or ) for concrete.…”
Section: Behavior Law Adapted For Fictitious Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diagram is then transformed into an average behavior relation of reinforced concrete. Please refer to the Benakli et al (2018) study [8] for a better understanding of the development of the law of fictitious behavior of steel. Therefore, an analytical model of computation is proposed.…”
Section: Behavior Law Adapted For Fictitious Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the second method, the concrete and the stirrups are both modelled using 3D solid elements, and considering bond‐slip relationship between steel rebar and concrete. A 3D FEM model of the bond‐controlled behaviour of RC columns has been done by Benaklia et al using the commercial FEM code ANSYS. In this study, the concrete and the steel reinforcement were represented by 3D solid elements and two nodes link elements, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods show good agreement with the experimental results in terms of limit force and the final cracking pattern. According to Benaklia et al, the controlling bond‐slip method provides better results in terms of the force‐displacement curve than the perfect bond method. But those studies have not pointed out the cracking process before rebar yielding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%