2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simpler spatial-sign-based two-sample test for high-dimensional data

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis article concerns the tests for the equality of two location parameters when the data dimension is larger than the sample size. Existing spatial-sign-based procedures are not robust with respect to high dimensionality, producing tests with the type-I error rates that are much larger than the nominal levels. We develop a correction that makes the sign-based tests applicable for high-dimensional data, allowing the dimensionality to increase as the square of the sample size. We show that the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works related to the high-dimensional SSCM B n (or its variants) include Zou et al (2014), Feng and Sun (2016), Li et al (2016) and Chakraborty and Chaudhuri (2017). A common feature in these papers is that given a specific null hypothesis on the population location or scatter, under elliptical distributions, in a one-sample or two-sample design, the authors have in their disposal a specific test statistic which is an explicit function of B n (or its variants).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works related to the high-dimensional SSCM B n (or its variants) include Zou et al (2014), Feng and Sun (2016), Li et al (2016) and Chakraborty and Chaudhuri (2017). A common feature in these papers is that given a specific null hypothesis on the population location or scatter, under elliptical distributions, in a one-sample or two-sample design, the authors have in their disposal a specific test statistic which is an explicit function of B n (or its variants).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%