2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2014.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simpler formula for the number of diagonal inversions of an (m,n)-parking function and a returning fermionic formula

Abstract: Recent results have placed the classical shuffle conjecture of Haglund et al. in a broader context of an infinite family of conjectures about parking functions in any rectangular lattice. The combinatorial side of the new conjectures has been defined using a complicated generalization of the dinv statistic which is composed of three parts and which is not obviously nonnegative. Here we simplify the definition of dinv, prove that it is always non-negative, and give a geometric description of the statistic in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following is a simpler description for the difference pdinv(π) − maxtdinv(π), given in [HL15]. Definition 3.16.…”
Section: Labelled Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is a simpler description for the difference pdinv(π) − maxtdinv(π), given in [HL15]. Definition 3.16.…”
Section: Labelled Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall use this definition of dinv in some combinatorial proofs in Section 3. However, our definition of dinv(PF) in Section 4 will follow the formulation by Leven and Hicks [14], who gave a simplified formula for dinv(PF) as the sum of two simpler statistics, tdinv and dinvcorr. Definition (dinvcorr).…”
Section: Combinatorial Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original formulation of Hikita [24] as modified by Gorsky-Mazin [17], [18] expressed the dinv statistic as a combination of tdinv and two other statistics. However, Hicks and Leven [23] showed that this can be simplified as follows. Let λ(P F ) be partitions whose english Ferrers diagram is formed by the cells above P F .…”
Section: 20mentioning
confidence: 99%