2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-007-0068-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simpler and tighter redundant Klee–Minty construction

Abstract: By introducing redundant Klee-Minty examples, we have previously shown that the central path can be bent along the edges of the Klee-Minty cubes, thus having 2 n − 2 sharp turns in dimension n. In those constructions the redundant hyperplanes were placed parallel with the facets active at the optimal solution. In this paper we present a simpler and more powerful construction, where the redundant constraints are parallel with the coordinate-planes. An important consequence of this new construction is that one o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tightest result is given by Nematollahi and Terlaky (2008). The redundant constraints are placed parallel to the coordinate hyperplanes at geometrically decaying distances, so only N ¼ Oðn2 2n Þ redundant inequalities are needed to force the central path to follow the simplex path of the n-dimensional Zinchenko (2008, 2009), substantiating the relationships and presenting partial results.…”
Section: Klee-minty Examples For Ipmsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tightest result is given by Nematollahi and Terlaky (2008). The redundant constraints are placed parallel to the coordinate hyperplanes at geometrically decaying distances, so only N ¼ Oðn2 2n Þ redundant inequalities are needed to force the central path to follow the simplex path of the n-dimensional Zinchenko (2008, 2009), substantiating the relationships and presenting partial results.…”
Section: Klee-minty Examples For Ipmsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While adding redundant constraints do not change the set of feasible solutions, the analytic center and the central path change. The redundant Klee-Minty example of Nematollahi and Terlaky (2008) is given as: min…”
Section: Interchange Heuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is precisely the content of Proposition 1; i.e., it proves that the analytic center of C n is in the δ-neighborhoodĈ n δ of the initial vertex v {n} . The proof of the proposition can be found in Nematollahi and Terlaky [63]. Proposition 1.…”
Section: The Tight Klee-minty Construction and Complexity Boundsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this chapter we discuss the tightest result to date. In Nematollahi and Terlaky [63], the authors simplify the construction given in Deza et al [27]. They are placing the redundant constraints parallel to the coordinate hyperplanes at geometrically decaying distances and show that only N = O(n2 2n ) redundant inequalities are needed to bend the central path along the edges of the n-dimensional Klee-Minty cube.…”
Section: Klee-minty Examples For Ipmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2 5 ) T , and the number of the redundant constraints is significantly reduced to N = O(n 3 2 2n ). A simplified construction, where the number of the redundant constraints is further reduced to N = O(n2 2n ), is presented in [9] by placing the redundant constraints parallel to the coordinate hyperplanes at geometrically decaying distances d…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%