2001
DOI: 10.1080/713663221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses

Abstract: A white noise technique is presented for estimating the response properties of spiking visual system neurons. The technique is simple, robust, efficient and well suited to simultaneous recordings from multiple neurons. It provides a complete and easily interpretable model of light responses even for neurons that display a common form of response nonlinearity that precludes classical linear systems analysis. A theoretical justification of the technique is presented that relies only on elementary linear algebra … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
537
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 685 publications
(562 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
537
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spot intensity was modulated in a pseudo-random fashion, and the relation between this dynamic flicker stimulus and the neuron's firing rate was fit with a simple linear–nonlinear (LN) model (Figure 1B; see Materials and Methods). The model yields two functions that characterize the neuron's response: the “filter” specifies how light intensity is integrated over time, and the “nonlinearity” accounts for distortions of the response, such as rectification at the bottom and saturation at the top of the firing range [21]. The goal was to test how these basic parameters of the light response were affected by global image shifts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spot intensity was modulated in a pseudo-random fashion, and the relation between this dynamic flicker stimulus and the neuron's firing rate was fit with a simple linear–nonlinear (LN) model (Figure 1B; see Materials and Methods). The model yields two functions that characterize the neuron's response: the “filter” specifies how light intensity is integrated over time, and the “nonlinearity” accounts for distortions of the response, such as rectification at the bottom and saturation at the top of the firing range [21]. The goal was to test how these basic parameters of the light response were affected by global image shifts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between ganglion cell firing rate and visual stimulus was fitted by an LN model [21,23] or by a 2LN model. The intensity s ( t ) of the circular spot was measured from the video monitor at 1-ms resolution, and normalized to have zero mean, a standard deviation equal to the contrast (0.3), and dimensionless units.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the neuron to each of its significant eigenvectors in a stimulus ensemble is measured by plotting the average neuronal response as a function of feature contrast (Figure 1D), yielding the contrast-response function [26,28,29] (see Materials and Methods). A steep contrast-response function indicates a high sensitivity of the neuron to the presence of the corresponding feature in the images, whereas a flat contrast-response function indicates that the neuronal response is insensitive to the presence of the feature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each feature, the contrast-response function was measured from the neuronal responses to 1–3 repeats of an ensemble; for nearly all cells (38/40), these repeats were distinct from those used to estimate the preferred features, in order to avoid bias [29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models often begin with a statistical description of the stimuli that precede a neural response such as the spike-triggered average (STA) [1, 2] or covariance (STC) [3–8]. These statistical measures characterize to some extent the set of effective stimuli that drive a response, but do not necessarily reveal how these statistical properties relate to cellular mechanisms or neural pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%