2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering Veracruz (ICEV) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icev50249.2020.9289692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Way To Bring Python To The Classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of the normality tests showed us that the distributions of the data of both variables were not normal, so according to Cabrera and Sánchez (2018), the Non-Parametric Test of Spearman's Rho Correlation Coefficient should be used [36]; as stated by Hernández et al (2014), Spearman's Rho Coefficient was used to statistically relate Likert-type scales since we consider our categorical ordinal variables [37]. At the same time, Chi-square was used as an alternative and comparative mode [38]. In turn for Hernández et al (2014), other coefficients were used to validate these correlations, such as: Phi Coefficient, Cramer's V Coefficient and Contingency Coefficient [39], the confidence interval used was 95% with a margin of error of 0.05%.…”
Section: Indicators By Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of the normality tests showed us that the distributions of the data of both variables were not normal, so according to Cabrera and Sánchez (2018), the Non-Parametric Test of Spearman's Rho Correlation Coefficient should be used [36]; as stated by Hernández et al (2014), Spearman's Rho Coefficient was used to statistically relate Likert-type scales since we consider our categorical ordinal variables [37]. At the same time, Chi-square was used as an alternative and comparative mode [38]. In turn for Hernández et al (2014), other coefficients were used to validate these correlations, such as: Phi Coefficient, Cramer's V Coefficient and Contingency Coefficient [39], the confidence interval used was 95% with a margin of error of 0.05%.…”
Section: Indicators By Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colab was chosen as a tool compatible with this approach due to its ability to support pedagogy through instruction & explanations inline with modifiable code. The interactive environment provided with computational notebooks like Colab can more directly encourage students to try new things [13].…”
Section: Instructor-led and Self-paced Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%