2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-013-0434-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Proof of the Existence of the Best Estimator in a Quasilinear Regression Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in practice, the probability that the NLS estimate does not exist cannot be ignored, see the following example. Only a handful of papers discuss the non‐existence of the NLS estimate either in terms of sufficient criteria Demidenko () or necessary and sufficient conditions for specific non‐linear regression models Hadeler et al (), Jukić & Markovic () & Jukić (), to name a few. The purpose of this section is to illustrate how the probability of non‐existence affects the density distribution using simplistic examples of non‐linear regression where this probability is tractable.…”
Section: Numerical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practice, the probability that the NLS estimate does not exist cannot be ignored, see the following example. Only a handful of papers discuss the non‐existence of the NLS estimate either in terms of sufficient criteria Demidenko () or necessary and sufficient conditions for specific non‐linear regression models Hadeler et al (), Jukić & Markovic () & Jukić (), to name a few. The purpose of this section is to illustrate how the probability of non‐existence affects the density distribution using simplistic examples of non‐linear regression where this probability is tractable.…”
Section: Numerical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%