2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-009-0759-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Proof of Hardy-Lieb-Thirring Inequalities

Abstract: Abstract:We give a short and unified proof of Hardy-Lieb-Thirring inequalities for moments of eigenvalues of fractional Schrödinger operators. The proof covers the optimal parameter range. It is based on a recent inequality by Solovej, Sørensen, and Spitzer. Moreover, we prove that any non-magnetic Lieb-Thirring inequality implies a magnetic Lieb-Thirring inequality (with possibly a larger constant).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the bound (6) cannot hold for ν = 1/2. In this case Theorem 4 is an equivalent of Hardy-Lieb-Thirring inequality (see [9,11,13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the bound (6) cannot hold for ν = 1/2. In this case Theorem 4 is an equivalent of Hardy-Lieb-Thirring inequality (see [9,11,13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statement follows from Lemma 20 by the usual arguments (see e.g. the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [4]): Let γ > 0 and q ∈ (1, 1 + γ). By the minimax principle we have…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the cases marked with "-" there exists no self-adjoint realisation, see Theorem 1. Note that in the case "Ia1" inequality (1.6) is a form of the HardyLieb-Thirring inequality (see [3,4,7]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular feature turns out to be extremely convenient, and sidesteps important complications that would arise had we used an estimate with a non-local error: the reader here should compare (1.27) with estimates where the error is nonlocal: see, for example, an exact formula due to M. Loss (1.27) allows us in particular to split the trace of the negative part of |σ · p A | 2s − C s /|x| 2s + V as the sum of that of two localized Hamiltonians -one which is localized around the origin and one far away from it. For the first Hamiltonian we apply Estimate (1.26) and then apply the Hardy-Lieb-Thirring inequality (1.9) as appears, for example, in [14]. For the part far away we obtain an effective localized potential, roughly equal to −Eφ/|x| 2s + V , with E a constant that goes beyond C s and φ the indicator function of a region far from the origin.…”
Section: The Strategy Of Proof and The Main Tools Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%