Abstract:E-cigarette devices are wide ranging, leading to significant differences in levels of toxic carbonyls in their respective aerosols. Power can be a useful method in predicting relative toxin concentrations within the same device, but does not correlate well to inter-device levels. Herein, we have developed a simple mathematical model utilizing parameters of an e-cigarette’s coil and wick in order to predict relative levels of e-liquid solvent degradation. Model 1, which is coil length/(wick surface area*wraps),… Show more
“…Poor wicking efficiency may lead to a dry wick and overheated e-liquid (dry puff), which promotes the formation of carbonyls and other toxic compounds 2 , 10 , 13 , 15 . Coil location, orientation, resistance and wick material, as well as power output, have been shown to affect carbonyl generation significantly 13 , 15 , 86 . E-liquid physical properties are also important in carbonyl formation 15 , 47 , 84 , 86 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flavourings may also contribute to the formation of carbonyls, as well as the characteristics of the e-cigarette devices, especially the applied voltage, coil resistance and wicking material [47][48][49]86,87 . Poor wicking efficiency may lead to a dry wick and overheated e-liquid (dry puff), which promotes the formation of carbonyls and other toxic compounds 2,10,13,15 . Coil location, orientation, resistance and wick material, as well as power output, have been shown to affect carbonyl generation significantly 13,15,86 .…”
Section: Polycyclic Aromatic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power levels that produce aerosol beyond the ability of the wick to resupply the liquid to the coil may result in overheating of the atomizer coil and consequently overheating of the e-liquid 10 , 11 . Different types of wicking material, varying in size and shape, have been used in e-cigarettes 3 , 13 . Silica was commonly the first material to be used as a wick, followed by cotton and ceramic 3 , 13 – 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of wicking material, varying in size and shape, have been used in e-cigarettes 3 , 13 . Silica was commonly the first material to be used as a wick, followed by cotton and ceramic 3 , 13 – 15 . Cotton has good wicking properties but is less thermally stable than silica 14 , 16 , 17 , while ceramic is chemically stable and heat-resistant 18 .…”
Fourth-generation ‘pod’ e-cigarette devices have been driven by technological advances in electronic atomization of the e-liquid. Use of microporous ceramic as a wicking material improves heating efficiency, but how it affects the chemical emissions of these devices is unclear. We assessed the emissions of a pod e-cigarette with innovative ceramic wick-based technology and two flavoured e-liquids containing nicotine lactate and nicotine benzoate (57 and 18 mg mL−1 nicotine, respectively). Among the studied harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) listed by the US FDA and/or WHO TobReg, only 5 (acetone, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, naphthalene and nornicotine) were quantified at levels of 0.14 to 100 ng puff−1. In the combustible cigarette (Kentucky reference 1R6F), levels were from 0.131 to 168 µg puff−1. Nicotine levels ranged 0.10–0.32 mg puff−1 across the 3 study products. From the 19 proposed HPHCs specifically of concern in e-cigarettes, only 3 (glycerol, isoamyl acetate and propylene glycol) were quantified. The low/undetectable levels of HPHCs reflect not only the optimal operating conditions of the e-cigarette, including an efficient supply of e-liquid by the ceramic wick without overheating, but also the potential of the e-cigarettes to be used as an alternative to combustible cigarettes.
“…Poor wicking efficiency may lead to a dry wick and overheated e-liquid (dry puff), which promotes the formation of carbonyls and other toxic compounds 2 , 10 , 13 , 15 . Coil location, orientation, resistance and wick material, as well as power output, have been shown to affect carbonyl generation significantly 13 , 15 , 86 . E-liquid physical properties are also important in carbonyl formation 15 , 47 , 84 , 86 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flavourings may also contribute to the formation of carbonyls, as well as the characteristics of the e-cigarette devices, especially the applied voltage, coil resistance and wicking material [47][48][49]86,87 . Poor wicking efficiency may lead to a dry wick and overheated e-liquid (dry puff), which promotes the formation of carbonyls and other toxic compounds 2,10,13,15 . Coil location, orientation, resistance and wick material, as well as power output, have been shown to affect carbonyl generation significantly 13,15,86 .…”
Section: Polycyclic Aromatic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power levels that produce aerosol beyond the ability of the wick to resupply the liquid to the coil may result in overheating of the atomizer coil and consequently overheating of the e-liquid 10 , 11 . Different types of wicking material, varying in size and shape, have been used in e-cigarettes 3 , 13 . Silica was commonly the first material to be used as a wick, followed by cotton and ceramic 3 , 13 – 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of wicking material, varying in size and shape, have been used in e-cigarettes 3 , 13 . Silica was commonly the first material to be used as a wick, followed by cotton and ceramic 3 , 13 – 15 . Cotton has good wicking properties but is less thermally stable than silica 14 , 16 , 17 , while ceramic is chemically stable and heat-resistant 18 .…”
Fourth-generation ‘pod’ e-cigarette devices have been driven by technological advances in electronic atomization of the e-liquid. Use of microporous ceramic as a wicking material improves heating efficiency, but how it affects the chemical emissions of these devices is unclear. We assessed the emissions of a pod e-cigarette with innovative ceramic wick-based technology and two flavoured e-liquids containing nicotine lactate and nicotine benzoate (57 and 18 mg mL−1 nicotine, respectively). Among the studied harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) listed by the US FDA and/or WHO TobReg, only 5 (acetone, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, naphthalene and nornicotine) were quantified at levels of 0.14 to 100 ng puff−1. In the combustible cigarette (Kentucky reference 1R6F), levels were from 0.131 to 168 µg puff−1. Nicotine levels ranged 0.10–0.32 mg puff−1 across the 3 study products. From the 19 proposed HPHCs specifically of concern in e-cigarettes, only 3 (glycerol, isoamyl acetate and propylene glycol) were quantified. The low/undetectable levels of HPHCs reflect not only the optimal operating conditions of the e-cigarette, including an efficient supply of e-liquid by the ceramic wick without overheating, but also the potential of the e-cigarettes to be used as an alternative to combustible cigarettes.
“…Published research on both cannabis and nicotine vaporization products has demonstrated that higher concentrations of undesirable and potentially toxic thermal degradation products are produced as temperature (or device power output) increases [7,[27][28][29]. These thermal degradants include aromatics (e.g., benzene, styrene), carbonyl compounds (e.g., formaldehyde, methacrolein), and others (e.g., polyaromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide) that should be avoided due to the potential for toxicity.…”
Section: Heating Coil Temperature and Implications For Consumer Riskmentioning
Vaporized cannabis is believed to be safer than smoking, but when heated to excessive temperatures nearing combustion (>900 °C) harmful byproducts may form. While some cannabis extract vaporizers operate well below these high temperatures, heating coil temperatures obtained during actual use are frequently not reported and many operate at high temperatures. We report on two major objectives: 1) development of an infrared thermography method to measure heating coil temperatures in cannabis extract vaporizers during a simulated puff and 2) a comparison of temperature- to voltage- controlled cannabis extract vaporization systems during a puff. Infrared thermography was used to measure heating coil temperatures in one temperature-controlled and two voltage-controlled systems. The cartridges were modified for direct line-of-sight on the heating coils, the wick and coils were saturated with cannabis extract, and fixtures were developed to force two liters per minute air flow past the coils for the full duration of the puff allowed by the device. The voltage-controlled systems produced higher temperatures with greater variability than the temperature-controlled system. At the highest temperature setting (420 °C) the temperature-controlled system reached an average heating coil temperature of 420 ± 9.5 °C whereas the 4.0V setting on the variable voltage system reached an average temperature of 543 ± 95.9 °C and the single voltage (3.2V) system an average of 450 ± 60.8 °C. The average temperature at the lowest setting (270 °C) on the temperature-controlled system was 246 ± 5.1 °C and the variable voltage system (2.4V) was 443 ± 56.1 °C. Voltage alone was a poor indicator of coil temperature and only the temperature-controlled system consistently maintained temperatures less than 400 °C for the full puff duration. These lower temperatures could reduce the likelihood of harmful thermal degradation products and thus may reduce potential health risk to consumers when vaporizing cannabis extracts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.