2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple population viability analysis of the Critically Endangered Euphorbia clivicola R.A. Dyer under four management scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interval of 3±5 years suggested by Begg et al (1981) agrees with our results, and other published recommendations (e.g. Silveira et al, 1999;Pfab and Witkowski, 2000;Roques et al, 2001). By contrast, the other management alternatives we simulated were disappointingly ineffective at reducing risk.…”
Section: Management Options and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interval of 3±5 years suggested by Begg et al (1981) agrees with our results, and other published recommendations (e.g. Silveira et al, 1999;Pfab and Witkowski, 2000;Roques et al, 2001). By contrast, the other management alternatives we simulated were disappointingly ineffective at reducing risk.…”
Section: Management Options and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Higher values of SRC indicate a greater sensitivity of model output to changes in a given parameter (the t-and P-values of the regression are also indicative of sensitivity). These six parameters explain 93Á8% of the variation observed in N Lindenmayer and Possingham, 1995;Silveira et al, 1999;Pfab and Witkowski, 2000). Yet long-term ®re suppression can also lead to habitat degradation, threatening those species dependent on moderate levels of disturbance (Breininger et al, 1999).…”
Section: Impact Of ®Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applications dealing with risk assessment, hybridisation and management of critically endangered animals, vaccination against infectious diseases, timing and intensity of pest control, frequency and cause of mouse, rat and stoat irruptions in a forest ecosystem, or survival prospects of populations under threat of predation are described (compare Keedwell, 2004). At present population viability analyses for plants are scarce (Pfab and Witkowski, 2000;Menges, 2000). The models and methods vary both in terms of complexity of www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) [2835][2836][2837][2838][2839][2840][2841][2842][2843][2844][2845] the underlying models and the quantity of data needed to parameterise them (Burgman et al, 1993;Morris et al, 1999;Bessinger, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation managers can improve the status of threatened species if they have some idea of how populations will respond to different fire regimes, but uncertainty about relative impacts often plagues decisions. Population viability analysis (PVA) is a modeling tool that can help managers to make more informed decisions about prescribing fire for threatened species (Burgman and Lamont 1992;Pfab and Witkowski 2000;Kaye et al 2001;QuintanaAscencio et al 2003;Regan and Auld 2004;Keith 2004;Menges and Quintana-Ascencio 2004). PVA works by using autecological and demographic monitoring data to parameterize a population model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%