2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01720-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple negative-pressure protective barrier for extubation of COVID-19 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Construction of enclosure barrier Economic, flexible, and lightweight Swart and Strydom 32 Letter to the editor Simulation study Plastic AB + CPS + suction tube One experiment in four steps Optical evaluation of smoke spreading Home-made smoke source to explore AB retaining capacity AB effectively limits aerosol spread qualitatively, but even adding suction and CPS covering AB does not prevent the escape of aerosol, especially when the internal volume is accessed through arm holes. Brown and colleagues 33 Letter to the editor Simulation study CPS over Mayo table frame Two experiments, comparing with AB Atomised droplet model using fluorescent dye and qualitative assessment CPS over Mayo frame compared with traditional AB Less spread using CPS over Mayo frame than with traditional AB Hung and colleagues 34 Research letter Simulation study CPS tent + suction system applied N/A CPS tent + suction applied for simulated extubation on mannequin Barrier-enclosure system for extubation Solution to limit the small droplet diffusion out of conventional AB; used successfully in simulation and clinical experience Suresh 35 Letter to the editor Technical report Acrylic AP/CPS tent N/A N/A Barrier-enclosure systems for airway management: AB, CPS tent, and C-ARM cover for anaesthesiologist Suggested use of ‘home-made’ PPE for preserving available resources during the pandemic Puthenveettil and Vijayaraghavan 36 Letter to the editor Technical report Acrylic AB (asymmetric ports) N/A N/A AB for airway management (including nasotracheal intubation and LMA placement) AB is ergonomic because of asymmetric ports; not advised for difficult intubation. Authors recommend this device be used for all patients so that the learning curve can be reached before intubation has to perform actual critical COVID patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… Construction of enclosure barrier Economic, flexible, and lightweight Swart and Strydom 32 Letter to the editor Simulation study Plastic AB + CPS + suction tube One experiment in four steps Optical evaluation of smoke spreading Home-made smoke source to explore AB retaining capacity AB effectively limits aerosol spread qualitatively, but even adding suction and CPS covering AB does not prevent the escape of aerosol, especially when the internal volume is accessed through arm holes. Brown and colleagues 33 Letter to the editor Simulation study CPS over Mayo table frame Two experiments, comparing with AB Atomised droplet model using fluorescent dye and qualitative assessment CPS over Mayo frame compared with traditional AB Less spread using CPS over Mayo frame than with traditional AB Hung and colleagues 34 Research letter Simulation study CPS tent + suction system applied N/A CPS tent + suction applied for simulated extubation on mannequin Barrier-enclosure system for extubation Solution to limit the small droplet diffusion out of conventional AB; used successfully in simulation and clinical experience Suresh 35 Letter to the editor Technical report Acrylic AP/CPS tent N/A N/A Barrier-enclosure systems for airway management: AB, CPS tent, and C-ARM cover for anaesthesiologist Suggested use of ‘home-made’ PPE for preserving available resources during the pandemic Puthenveettil and Vijayaraghavan 36 Letter to the editor Technical report Acrylic AB (asymmetric ports) N/A N/A AB for airway management (including nasotracheal intubation and LMA placement) AB is ergonomic because of asymmetric ports; not advised for difficult intubation. Authors recommend this device be used for all patients so that the learning curve can be reached before intubation has to perform actual critical COVID patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All were published between December 1, 2019 and May 27, 2020. There were 19 correspondences, 4e22 16 letters to the editor, 23e33,35e39 10 original articles, 40e49 three research letters, 34,50,51 one guideline, 52 one short recommendation, 53 one case report, 54 and one quality improvement study. 55 Of these reports, there were only six case reports or small case series.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations