2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2010.5501820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Necessary and Sufficient Condition for the Double Unicast Problem

Abstract: Abstract-We consider a directed acyclic network where there are two source-terminal pairs and the terminals need to receive the symbols generated at the respective sources. Each source independently generates an i.i.d. random process over the same alphabet. Each edge in the network is error-free, delay-free, and can carry one symbol from the alphabet per use. We give a simple necessary and sufficient condition for being able to simultaneously satisfy the unicast requirements of the two source-terminal pairs at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the received signal at d 1 has the same distribution as the received signal at v in network N , similar to (5), for N BC , we have…”
Section: Bottleneck Nodesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since the received signal at d 1 has the same distribution as the received signal at v in network N , similar to (5), for N BC , we have…”
Section: Bottleneck Nodesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The authors in [8] and [9] explore the case when each source transmits one symbol at a time, or equivalently, R 1 = R 2 = 1 in detail, whereas we allow arbitrary rate pairs. Reference [10], also consider the scenario where the rates are arbitrary.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our setup is somewhat different from the above-mentioned works in that we consider directed acyclic networks with unit capacity edges and assume that we only know certain minimum cut values for the network, e.g., mincut(S i , T j ), where S i ⊆ {s 1 , s 2 } and T j ⊆ {t 1 , t 2 } for different subsets S i and T j . This is related to the work of Wang and Shroff [8] (see also [9]) for two-unicast that presented a necessary and sufficient condition on the network structure for the existence of a network coding solution that supports unit rate transmission for each s i −t i pair. In this work we consider general rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the two-unicast network [15], [23], [26], [27], [28], where (a) linear network coding is insufficient for capacity, (b) vector linear codes outperform scalar linear codes, and (c) the generalized network sharing (GNS) cut set bound is not tight in general, the question of whether non-linear network coding, vector linear codes, or bounds stronger than the GNS bound are required to characterize the achievable rate region for two-unicast-Z networks was open. In particular, because two-unicast-Z networks are a special case of two-unicast networks, the results which demonstrate the insufficiency of scalar linear and non-linear codes and the GNS bounds, for two-unicast networks, do not naturally extend to two-unicast-Z networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%