1972
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4608/2/4/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple muffin tin model for the electrical resistivity of liquid noble and transition metals and their alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are consistent with the presence of the gap of the experimental DOS [13]. We check our choice by calculating it electrical resistivity based on the extended Ziman formalism [21]. We start by constructing the muffin potentials necessary to the electrons scattering.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These values are consistent with the presence of the gap of the experimental DOS [13]. We check our choice by calculating it electrical resistivity based on the extended Ziman formalism [21]. We start by constructing the muffin potentials necessary to the electrons scattering.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The results of numerical calculations [4] of the concentration dependence of the electrical resistivity of the alloy systems Ni-Au, Fe-Au, Ni-Sn and Fe-Ge are in reasonable agreement with the experiment.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…This approach was necessary particularly for the transition metals where the first Born approximation was not accurate enough [7][8][9][10][11]. What we have found examining this model is that the results here are much more stable than for the F-Z one, and that there is practically no free choice of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Apart from the Esposito method there are also the Dreirach one [7] and several other propositions [8,20], where the authors notice that the obtained resistivity may significantly differ from experiment and even the free electron model calculations may result in better agreement [21].…”
Section: Fermi Energymentioning
confidence: 99%