1991
DOI: 10.1080/09500349114552011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Model of Gain Saturation in Homogeneously CW Lasers with Distributed Losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple approximate expression describing dependence of the output power on the global small-signal gain coefficient, the distributed losses, the mirror reflectance, and the transverse mode distribution has been derived. However, the model presented in [24] is confined to the "dual case P" and it gives the results, which are in good agreement with the exact solutions [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] in the low-power limit.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A simple approximate expression describing dependence of the output power on the global small-signal gain coefficient, the distributed losses, the mirror reflectance, and the transverse mode distribution has been derived. However, the model presented in [24] is confined to the "dual case P" and it gives the results, which are in good agreement with the exact solutions [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] in the low-power limit.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In equations (22) and (23) we introduce the normalized function f … rT; z † which describes the spatial distribution of the small signal gain and, in general, it depends on the pumping conditions. In this paper we use these equations as a starting point for an approximate analysis based on the energy theorem developed and veri®ed earlier [29,31] for two-mirror as well as distributed feedback lasers.…”
Section: Approximate Solution Of the Self-consistency Equationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[42] for a detailed discussion). It i8 worth noting that this approximation has been verified for two-mirror lasers [42][43][44][45] as well as dis t ributed feedback lasers [46][47][48][49][50]. Thus, in the case of the F-P resonator, according to [42], we have where the propagation constant γq is equal to Ύq = (1/2L) ln[1/(R1R2)] and R1 , 2 denotes amplitude reflectivities at the end faces.…”
Section: Threshold Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) it is assumed that the effective number of excited ions interacting with the laser mode can be averaged into a product of the axial mean fraction (is), the modal confinement factor Γ, and the average longitudinal distribution intensities, IR and IS, of the counter-propagating waves of the laser mode where the modal confinement factor Γ is defined as Γ = fó |Εm(x)| 2 dx and the average longitudinal distribution intensities, In. and Is, are given in the threshold field approximation [42] by and respectively. It is worth noting that in general IR and IS are different for the asymmetric structure.…”
Section: Threshold Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation