2020
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple microsphere‐based mold to rapidly fabricate microwell arrays for multisize 3D tumor culture

Abstract: Three‐dimensional (3D) tumor has been considered as the best in vitro model for cancer research. In recent years, various methods have been developed to controllable prepare multisize 3D tumors. Nonetheless, reported technologies are still problematic and difficult to produce 3D tumors with highly uniform size and cell content. Here, a novel and simple microsphere‐based mold approach is proposed to rapidly fabricate spherical microwell arrays for multisize 3D tumors formation, culture, and recovery. Larger amo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2−5 In recent years, spherical hollow features have attracted considerable attention from scientists and engineers due to their wide applications in biomedical and optical fields. Extensive efforts have therefore been devoted to the construction of spherical microcavities, including thermally reflowed microball molding, 6,7 magnetassisted microbead molding, 8,9 gas expansion molding, 10−14 and droplet molding. 15−21 Due to the geometrical contraction of the spherical microcavity's opening, the replication of spherical microcavities from microballs or microbeads inevitably suffers from the difficulty of demolding or even obtaining fractured spherical microcavities.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2−5 In recent years, spherical hollow features have attracted considerable attention from scientists and engineers due to their wide applications in biomedical and optical fields. Extensive efforts have therefore been devoted to the construction of spherical microcavities, including thermally reflowed microball molding, 6,7 magnetassisted microbead molding, 8,9 gas expansion molding, 10−14 and droplet molding. 15−21 Due to the geometrical contraction of the spherical microcavity's opening, the replication of spherical microcavities from microballs or microbeads inevitably suffers from the difficulty of demolding or even obtaining fractured spherical microcavities.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 24 ] These wells, however, are difficult to fabricate, requiring micromachining, subtractive etching methods, embossing of plastics or specialized deposition methods. [ 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ] Additive fabrication approaches are superior because they use photolithographic techniques that are simple, inexpensive, and ubiquitous. However, photolithographic fabrication of wells with controlled curvature is challenging, requiring complex mask and lens systems to modulate light intensity with micrometer resolution across the array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwells can be fabricated using various microfabrication techniques, which enable the formation of spheroids of desired sizes. 11 13 However, most microwell-based platforms are generated on plane substrates and do not completely mimic the native nanostructure of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Meanwhile, electrospun nano/microfibers are widely used as tissue engineering scaffolds because they can recapitulate aspects of native ECM for in vitro cell cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%