1996
DOI: 10.1109/20.486537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method to determine dynamic hysteresis loops of soft magnetic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prozygy [5] attacked the issue of understanding the Jiles-Atherton model parameters from a different perspective and used simple variational techniques to demonstrate the relationship between parameter variations and the main effects of the hysteresis loop, e.g., varying the parameter was responsible primarily for the loop height. More recently, Schmidt and Güldner [6] used the model as the core of an optimization approach to fit curve data and this was also used by Lederer et al [7] to propose modifications to the original model to handle the variations in parameters between minor and major loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prozygy [5] attacked the issue of understanding the Jiles-Atherton model parameters from a different perspective and used simple variational techniques to demonstrate the relationship between parameter variations and the main effects of the hysteresis loop, e.g., varying the parameter was responsible primarily for the loop height. More recently, Schmidt and Güldner [6] used the model as the core of an optimization approach to fit curve data and this was also used by Lederer et al [7] to propose modifications to the original model to handle the variations in parameters between minor and major loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first issue is how to define the performance of a model in an appropriate way. The optimization technique used in [6] used a least squares fit approach. This does consider the key features in the model that may have different relative importance depending on the application, which are not taken into account in the optimization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the prediction error {ε(t k )} N t k =max(n α ,n β )+1 is white noise, an estimate of the model parameters θ can be solved using the least squares aŝ (10) where…”
Section: B Indirect Continuous-time Model Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials were plated onto 6 m thick insulation and an additional adhesive tape was used to provide mechanical strength. Loss measurements were carried out using the transformer method [16], with compensation included for the delay of the current probe and air-core leakage effects. As shown, both materials provide improved loss properties compared to 4F1 up to 5 MHz, with Alloy 1 providing the best performance.…”
Section: Electroplated Alloy Core Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%