2013
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/10/5/055003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for the determination of the porosity and tortuosity of meteorites with ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no systematic influence on the density results from the variable numbers of scans needed to acquire the complete volumes when analyzing sample masses of 30–360 g. The measured densities of fragments from the Tamdakht and Huaxi meteorites are consistent with previous density measurements on smaller fragments, performed by El Abassi et al. () and Li et al. (), respectively, which suggest that the bulk density data presented here are accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found no systematic influence on the density results from the variable numbers of scans needed to acquire the complete volumes when analyzing sample masses of 30–360 g. The measured densities of fragments from the Tamdakht and Huaxi meteorites are consistent with previous density measurements on smaller fragments, performed by El Abassi et al. () and Li et al. (), respectively, which suggest that the bulk density data presented here are accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Results show that measurements of the porosity using our method are similar to the ultrasound measurements presented in [7]. The calculated porosities of the two meteorite specimens are low (13.41 % for Aubrite and 11.02 % for Bra chinite).…”
Section: B Results For 3d Porosity Imagessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Consolmagno et al [5], [6] used the ideal gas pycnometry which yields accurate total porosity values. Recently in [7], the porosity of meteorites has been determined from reflection coefficient measurements using ultrasonic waves. However, it gives no indication of 3 ISTO, 4 PRISME, Polytech'OrLeans University of Orleans B. P. 6744, Orleans, France the location or structure of the porosity in terrestrial and extraterrestrial rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tortuosities of chondritic meteorites have an average value of 1.45 [71], and the empirical exponent m for carbonaceous meteorites might be similar to that of nearshore sediments with a value of 2 [68].…”
Section: Appendix A: Advection and Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free water diffusion coefficient, D0, represents the unobstructed diffusion of a species, the porosity factor, φ, represents the void fraction of the medium, the constrictivity factor, δ, represents the bottleneck effect due to small pore diameters, and the tortuosity factor, τ , represents the restiction in diffusive flow due to curves in the pores. Estimates of these factors, and the empirical exponent, m, for carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites are, D0 = 4×10 −10 m 2 s −1 , φ = 0.25, δ = 1, τ = 1.45, and m = 2 [68][69][70][71] The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65…”
Section: Appendix A: Advection and Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%