Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1975
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(75)90202-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for the determination of oestrogen receptor concentrations in breast tumours and other tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oestrogen-receptor (ER) assay.-Tumours were assayed by the normal method for each of the two laboratories (King et al, 1977;Hawkins et al, 1975). In principle both methods were similar, using saturation analysis with separation by dextran-coated charcoal to measure only unoccupied soluble receptor sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oestrogen-receptor (ER) assay.-Tumours were assayed by the normal method for each of the two laboratories (King et al, 1977;Hawkins et al, 1975). In principle both methods were similar, using saturation analysis with separation by dextran-coated charcoal to measure only unoccupied soluble receptor sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oe8trogen-receptor activity was determined by the method of Hawkins, Hill and Freedman (1975). A portion (160 >mg) of fat-free tumour was homogenized in tris buffer (0-25 M sucrose, 10 mM tris and 1 mM ethylene diamine tetra-acetate) at the rate of 100 mg/ml for 3 x 15 s, with intervals for cooling between periods of homogenization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each tumour wTas excised from the breast, measured and sectioned into 2-3 cubes. Each cube was divided into 2, one portion being used for histological examination, the other for oestrogen-receptor assay.Oe8trogen-receptor activity was determined by the method of Hawkins, Hill and Freedman (1975). A portion (160 >mg) of fat-free tumour was homogenized in tris buffer (0-25 M sucrose, 10 mM tris and 1 mM ethylene diamine tetra-acetate) at the rate of 100 mg/ml for 3 x 15 s, with intervals for cooling between periods of homogenization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential sources of laboratory variability have been well reviewed by Thorpe (1987). Intralaboratory variation in a number of studies using LBA is reported to range from 15% to 34% (Hawkins et al, 1975(Hawkins et al, , 1987bTaylor et al, 1982; Davis et al, 1984;Bojar, 1986;Anderson et al, 1989 Nicholson et al, 1986) and 3.7% to 16.7% (Bojar, 1986;Jordan et al, 1986;Leclerq et al, 1986;Nicholson et al, 1986) respectively. The interlaboratory CV for EIA was reported to range between 10% and 19% (Bojar, 1986;Leclerq et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%