2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02209.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level

Abstract: Microsatellites are powerful molecular markers, used commonly to estimate intraspecific genetic distances. With the exception of band sharing similarity index, available distance measures were developed specifically for diploid organisms and are unsuited for comparisons of polyploids. Here, we present a simple method for calculation of microsatellite genotype distances, which takes into account mutation processes and permits comparison of individuals with different ploidy levels. This method should provide a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
426
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
426
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, one allele was recognized to be duplicated in one of the two bands (Ohara et al 1999). Pairwise distances between multilocus genotypes were calculated using the method first described by Bruvo et al (2004). The obtained distance matrices then served to construct the neighbor-joining tree with MEGA software version 3.1 (http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.html).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, one allele was recognized to be duplicated in one of the two bands (Ohara et al 1999). Pairwise distances between multilocus genotypes were calculated using the method first described by Bruvo et al (2004). The obtained distance matrices then served to construct the neighbor-joining tree with MEGA software version 3.1 (http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.html).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical analyses in poppr start with summary statistics for diversity, rarefaction, evenness, MLG counts, and calculation of distance measures such as Bruvo's distance, providing a suitable stepwise mutation model appropriate for microsatellite markers [25]. Poppr will define MLGs in your data set, show where they cross populations, and can produce graphs and tables of MLGs by population that can be used for further analysis with the R package vegan [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poppr complements and builds on previously existing R packages including adegenet and vegan [22][23][24] while implementing tools novel to R significantly facilitating data import, population genetic analyses, and graphing of clonal or partially clonal populations. These tools include among others: analysis across hierarchies of populations, subsetting of populations, clone-censoring, Bruvo's genetic distance [25], the index of association and related statistics [17,18], and bootstrap support for trees based on Bruvo's distance. By providing a centralized suite of tools appropriate for many data types, this package represents a novel and useful resource specifically tailored for analysis of clonal populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distances for sequence data are easily calculated using one of the nucleotide substitution models present in the dist.dna() function in the ape R package (Paradis et al 2004), but are only applicable to haplotype data. For simple sequence repeats (SSR) data, if one can assume that the alleles mutate in a stepwise fashion, Bruvo's distance, as implemented in poppr, polysat, and Genodive is appropriate for all ploidy levels (Bruvo et al 2004;Clark and Jasieniuk 2011;Kamvar et al 2014;Meirmans and Van Tienderen 2004). Calculating genetic distance for polyploid data are challenging because of ambiguity of heterozygous genotypes (e.g., a tetraploid heterozygote with alleles A and T could be ATTT, AATT, or AAAT).…”
Section: Distances Between Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating genetic distance for polyploid data are challenging because of ambiguity of heterozygous genotypes (e.g., a tetraploid heterozygote with alleles A and T could be ATTT, AATT, or AAAT). Bruvo et al (2004) addressed this with three models that account for allelic ambiguity, all of which are implemented in both polysat and poppr. For polyploid SSR data that doesn't follow a stepwise mutation model one can use the methods implemented in the meandist.matrix2() function in polysat or turn Bruvo's distance into the simple mismatch distance by multiplying all fragment lengths by 1,000 as demonstrated in Metzger et al (2015).…”
Section: Distances Between Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%