“…PCR techniques are essentially required for such studies due to the limitations of ancient samples and available amounts of DNA. However, aDNA extraction suitable for successful PCR amplification is complicated by several intrinsic factors: the aDNA is highly degraded and damaged (Pä ä bo, 1989;Hagelberg and Clegg, 1991;Handt et al, 1994;Höss et al, 1996;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005;Mulligan, 2005); presents in low copy number (Handt et al, 1994;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Poinar et al, 1996;Yang et al, 1998;Kumar et al, 2000); it is contaminated with exogenous DNAs that originated from other organisms and contemporary humans (Kolman and Tuross, 2000;Pä ä bo et al, 2004;Calacal and De Ungria, 2005;Kemp and Smith, 2005;Mulligan, 2005;Hunter, 2006); and it coexists with a number of potential PCR inhibitors, such as humic acid, fulvic acid, biologically degraded products, and collagen (Hä nni et al, 1995;Kalmar et al, 2000;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005).Because of these complexities, there have been a variety of ancient DNA extraction methods attempted, such as phenol-chloroform extraction (Blake et al, 1992;Kurosaki et al, 1993;Faerman et al, 1995; Hänni et al, 1995) and ethanol or isopropanol precipitation (Kurosaki et al, 1993;Cattaneo et al, 1995Cattaneo et al, , 1997 Hänni et al, 1995)
…”