1995
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01758-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for extracting DNA from old skeletal material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR techniques are essentially required for such studies due to the limitations of ancient samples and available amounts of DNA. However, aDNA extraction suitable for successful PCR amplification is complicated by several intrinsic factors: the aDNA is highly degraded and damaged (Pä ä bo, 1989;Hagelberg and Clegg, 1991;Handt et al, 1994;Höss et al, 1996;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005;Mulligan, 2005); presents in low copy number (Handt et al, 1994;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Poinar et al, 1996;Yang et al, 1998;Kumar et al, 2000); it is contaminated with exogenous DNAs that originated from other organisms and contemporary humans (Kolman and Tuross, 2000;Pä ä bo et al, 2004;Calacal and De Ungria, 2005;Kemp and Smith, 2005;Mulligan, 2005;Hunter, 2006); and it coexists with a number of potential PCR inhibitors, such as humic acid, fulvic acid, biologically degraded products, and collagen (Hä nni et al, 1995;Kalmar et al, 2000;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005).Because of these complexities, there have been a variety of ancient DNA extraction methods attempted, such as phenol-chloroform extraction (Blake et al, 1992;Kurosaki et al, 1993;Faerman et al, 1995; Hänni et al, 1995) and ethanol or isopropanol precipitation (Kurosaki et al, 1993;Cattaneo et al, 1995Cattaneo et al, , 1997 Hänni et al, 1995) …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PCR techniques are essentially required for such studies due to the limitations of ancient samples and available amounts of DNA. However, aDNA extraction suitable for successful PCR amplification is complicated by several intrinsic factors: the aDNA is highly degraded and damaged (Pä ä bo, 1989;Hagelberg and Clegg, 1991;Handt et al, 1994;Höss et al, 1996;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005;Mulligan, 2005); presents in low copy number (Handt et al, 1994;O'Rourke et al, 1996;Poinar et al, 1996;Yang et al, 1998;Kumar et al, 2000); it is contaminated with exogenous DNAs that originated from other organisms and contemporary humans (Kolman and Tuross, 2000;Pä ä bo et al, 2004;Calacal and De Ungria, 2005;Kemp and Smith, 2005;Mulligan, 2005;Hunter, 2006); and it coexists with a number of potential PCR inhibitors, such as humic acid, fulvic acid, biologically degraded products, and collagen (Hä nni et al, 1995;Kalmar et al, 2000;Keyser-Tracqui and Ludes, 2005).Because of these complexities, there have been a variety of ancient DNA extraction methods attempted, such as phenol-chloroform extraction (Blake et al, 1992;Kurosaki et al, 1993;Faerman et al, 1995; Hänni et al, 1995) and ethanol or isopropanol precipitation (Kurosaki et al, 1993;Cattaneo et al, 1995Cattaneo et al, , 1997 Hänni et al, 1995) …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] One of the goals of this study was to verify if the procedures of the Institute of Legal Medicine of São Paulo City for cleaning by boiling human remains is a valid and helpful method in the analysis of DNA for identification. The classic morphologic examination of bones is not attempted without removing the decomposing soft tissues by physical or chemical methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, silica based DNA binding procedures are known to be effective in removing PCR inhibitors such as humic acid, iron, cobalt, tannins and so forth [1,6,27,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Organic Extraction Versus Silica Column Based Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, chelating methods are routine choices in many laboratories because of the fact that DNA can be successfully isolated of from bones without co-purification of PCR inhibitors [1,[34][35]. Also silica offers many advantages such as low toxicity, biocompatibility, low cost, quick and easy, scalable, efficient removal of PCR inhibitors [27,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%