1997
DOI: 10.1139/m97-065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for enumerating bacteriophages in soil

Abstract: A plaque technique that uses antibiotic-resistant bacteria growing on antibiotic-containing agar for the assay lawn resulted in significantly better recovery of bacteriophages P1 of Escherichia coli and F116 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from nonsterile soil than standard membrane filtration or centrifugation techniques. Adsorption of the phages on soil particles appeared to be involved in their recovery and survival in soil.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are an estimated 10 30 prokaryotes in the biosphere, the vast majority of which are in the subsurface terrestrial, sediments, and the oceans [18]. Generally, there are $1-10 phage particles per prokaryotic cell in environmental samples [19][20][21][22]. Therefore, most of the world's phages are probably found in these biomes as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are an estimated 10 30 prokaryotes in the biosphere, the vast majority of which are in the subsurface terrestrial, sediments, and the oceans [18]. Generally, there are $1-10 phage particles per prokaryotic cell in environmental samples [19][20][21][22]. Therefore, most of the world's phages are probably found in these biomes as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are an estimated 10 30 prokaryotes in the biosphere, the vast majority of which are in the subsurface terrestrial, sediments, and the oceans [18]. Generally, there are ∼1–10 phage particles per prokaryotic cell in environmental samples [19–22]. Therefore, most of the world's phages are probably found in these biomes as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently as 2003, the abundance of autochthonous viruses in soil was unknown (5,57). Previous assessments of viral abundance in soils were based on determination of PFU by using susceptible indicator strains (64), microscopic enumeration of optically active viruses such as baculoviruses (53), or PCR amplification of viral nucleic acids by using specific primers (43). These approaches are unsatisfactory for determining the abundance of autochthonous soil viruses, since each method targets only a specific fraction of the total viral community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%