2004
DOI: 10.5414/cnp62097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for correcting overestimated glomerular filtration rate in obese subjects evaluated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula: a comparison with 51Cr EDTA clearance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also evidence that, for obese individuals, the Cockcroft-Gault formula overestimates the actual value of CrCl. 18 Another limiting factor is that studies on large samples have shown only a moderate correlation between CrCl estimated through formulae and that measured directly with different laboratory methods. That fact has been confirmed in our study, in which a correlation coefficient of only 0.48 was observed between CrCl measured in the 24-hour urine collection and that calculated by use of the CockcroftGault formula.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence that, for obese individuals, the Cockcroft-Gault formula overestimates the actual value of CrCl. 18 Another limiting factor is that studies on large samples have shown only a moderate correlation between CrCl estimated through formulae and that measured directly with different laboratory methods. That fact has been confirmed in our study, in which a correlation coefficient of only 0.48 was observed between CrCl measured in the 24-hour urine collection and that calculated by use of the CockcroftGault formula.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of GFR was estimated using creatinine clearance as measured by 24-h urine sample, without correcting for body surface area, because the correction would underestimate considerably the real value of the GFR (29). For the same reason, we did not use other types of formulas to estimate the GFR (Cockcroft- Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), because these formulas are designed for patients with chronic renal failure and, if applied to our study population, also would underestimate the real value of GFR (30,31). Almost half of the EO patients in our study presented with albuminuria and/or proteinuria before undergoing BS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepant results regarding GFR in obese versus normal-weight individuals might mainly be explainable by the use of creatinine clearance for the estimation of GFR, as this might be an imprecise instrument that has not been validated for obese patients: in general, GFR is underestimated when ideal body weight (IBW) is used and overestimated when total body weight (TBW) is used. The estimation of GFR using the weightindependent MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula has been shown to correlate better with 51 Cr-EDTA clearance than the estimation using the CockroftGault formula (r = 0.818 vs. r = 0.687) [10], however, the result of the MDRD formula is given in ml/min/1.73 m 2 with the limitation of incorrect body surface area (BSA) estimation in obese individuals. A recent report found no significant differences in GFR measured by [ 125 I]Na isothalamate clearance in morbidly obese patients as compared to normal weight controls (116.0 vs. 93.5 ml/min, P = 0.36) [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%