2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple, least-time, and energy-efficient routing protocol with one-level data aggregation for wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They introduce the gateway to aggregate the demands from the mobile users, and formulate it as an utility maximization problem. Misra et al [17] propose a lightweight energy-efficient routing scheme for wireless sensor network to increase the network life time. The neighbor nodes with higher energy aggregates the data from other nodes and forwards the aggregated data packet to the destination.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduce the gateway to aggregate the demands from the mobile users, and formulate it as an utility maximization problem. Misra et al [17] propose a lightweight energy-efficient routing scheme for wireless sensor network to increase the network life time. The neighbor nodes with higher energy aggregates the data from other nodes and forwards the aggregated data packet to the destination.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different aspects of CLOD are compared with EOR [26], LEO [27], MRE [28]. The performance of CLOD is researched with respect to energy consumption, throughput, congestion ratio and stability.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide an efficient communication between MANET nodes, different routing protocols were proposed, such as proactive (i.e., OLSR and DSDV), reactive (i.e., AODV and DSR), hybrid (i.e., ZRP), hierarchal (i.e., CBRR and FSR), fault-tolerant routing protocols (i.e., FTAR, LAFTRA, and WEFTR), and energy-based routing protocols (i.e., REEP, LEO, EAAR, BFIRIP) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Although VANET is considered as a subclass of MANET, different key factors make the routing protocols designed for MANETs not that efficient for VANETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%