2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1162543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Law for Ice-Shelf Calving

Abstract: A major problem for ice-sheet models is that no physically based law for the calving process has been established. Comparison across a diverse set of ice shelves demonstrates that iceberg calving increases with the along-flow spreading rate of a shelf. This relation suggests that frictional buttressing loss, which increases spreading, also leads to shelf retreat, a process known to accelerate ice-sheet flow and contribute to sea-level rise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present and pending further development, ISSM is already capable of tackling systems of several [78] Several modules are currently being developed to improve ISSM. One module will include a calving law to constrain ice front positions and their time evolution, following the work of Alley et al [2008], Walter et al [2010], and Bassis [2011]. Second, we will include a more sophisticated, higher-order scheme of grounding line dynamics as by Nowicki [2007] to capture ice flow instabilities, nonlinearities and hysteretic effects, which may not be well captured with our current hydrostatic criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present and pending further development, ISSM is already capable of tackling systems of several [78] Several modules are currently being developed to improve ISSM. One module will include a calving law to constrain ice front positions and their time evolution, following the work of Alley et al [2008], Walter et al [2010], and Bassis [2011]. Second, we will include a more sophisticated, higher-order scheme of grounding line dynamics as by Nowicki [2007] to capture ice flow instabilities, nonlinearities and hysteretic effects, which may not be well captured with our current hydrostatic criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GCMs with active ice shelves, a calving law is needed to release the tabular iceberg into the ocean. The question of what calving law to use is a topic of ongoing research [Benn et al, 2007;Alley et al, 2008;Levermann et al, 2012;Bassis and Jacobs, 2013] and is still unresolved. One potential way to temporarily bypass this problem would be to run hindcast simulations using historically observed calving events.…”
Section: Journal Of Advances In Modeling Earth Systems 101002/2017msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the focus of this study is on developing a framework for modeling tabular icebergs, we bypass the question of how to prescribe a physical calving law [Benn et al, 2007;Alley et al, 2008;Levermann et al, 2012;Bassis and Jacobs, 2013] by manually breaking off a semicircular iceberg. This is achieved by allowing all ice elements initially within a 14.4 km radius of the center of the ice front to move freely while the other ice elements continue to be held stationary.…”
Section: Iceberg Calvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the shelf as a whole is in near hydrostatic balance with the ocean waters, the flow structure inside the ice shelf determines that it is a dynamic scenario of advancing-thinning-breaking, from groundling line toward the calving front. ''Along-flow spreading'' is believed the dominant control on ice shelf calving (Thomas 1973;Alley et al 2008;Winkelmann et al 2011). Ice shelves spread under their own weight and the imbalance pushes at the calving front and around the grounding line.…”
Section: The Calving Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the exact calving timing and sizes of the icebergs are not well simulated at present. To improve timing simulations of calving events, it may be necessary to include triggers such as pressure perturbations caused by long waves (compared with b k , otherwise cancellations are significant between positive and negative phases and net pressure in the vertical direction is small), tides, tsunamis, and collisions with passing icebergs, as suggested by Alley et al (2008) and more recently partially proved valid by Bromirski et al (2010). Further improvements of the results, higher resolution ice and bedrock geometry data (on sub-kilometer scale) are needed for the entire AIS, not only the peripheral areas, as initial seed cracks are difficult to capture for eastern Antarctica.…”
Section: Model Calvingmentioning
confidence: 99%