2010
DOI: 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.59.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple in situ Extraction Method for Dissolved Sulfide in Sandy Mud Sediments Followed by Spectrophotometric Determination and Its Application to the Bottom Sediment at the Northeast of Ariake Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All cores were sectioned into thicknesses of 1 or 2 cm. A pore water sample was extracted from each section based on the methods reported in Sugahara et al (2010). 2.5 mL of sediment from each section was placed into a 10 mL polyethylene syringe.…”
Section: Sampling Area and Pretreatment For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All cores were sectioned into thicknesses of 1 or 2 cm. A pore water sample was extracted from each section based on the methods reported in Sugahara et al (2010). 2.5 mL of sediment from each section was placed into a 10 mL polyethylene syringe.…”
Section: Sampling Area and Pretreatment For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colorimetric determination of dissolved sulfide, which was defined as the sum of H 2 S, HS -and S 2-, was accomplished according to the modified methods of Cline 1969(Sugahara et al 2010. The sulfide concentration measured using this method was referred to as Σ(H 2 S).…”
Section: Colorimetric Determination Of H 2 S In Interstitial Water Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have developed simple and/or sensitive methods for the determination of chemical species, such as dissolved sulfide, [1][2][3] phosphate, 4,5 ammonia, 6,7 nitrite, 8 and hydrazine 9 in environmental water. Dissolved sulfide in environmental water is produced from microbial sulfate reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%