1991
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple Hill element-nonlinear spring model of muscle contraction biomechanics

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a model to predict the mechanical response of muscles during isometric tetanic, afterloaded isotonic and isovelocity shortening contractions. Two versions of the model were developed. Both incorporated a contractile element that obeyed a Hill force-velocity relationship and a series elastic element. In a quadratic spring version, the series elastic element force was represented as proportional to the square of the stretch; in a cubic spring version, it was represented a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-linear approximations to characterize limb mechanics often include a cubic stiffness term in addition to linear stiffness and damping terms [78] , [79] , [80] , [81] . Maintaining constant stiffness and damping parameters and as in (52), we included a cubic stiffness term so that in the matrix version of (17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-linear approximations to characterize limb mechanics often include a cubic stiffness term in addition to linear stiffness and damping terms [78] , [79] , [80] , [81] . Maintaining constant stiffness and damping parameters and as in (52), we included a cubic stiffness term so that in the matrix version of (17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models have focused at the molecular level or at the single motor unit using Hill's force-velocity equations (Lloyd and Besier 2003;Schultz et al 1991;Wexler et al 1997;Whipp and Wasserman 1969), thus providing predictions of force generating capacity but not the fatiguing aspect. The process of muscle fatiguing is dependent not only on the mechanical aspect but also on a number of factors such as neural signaling, oxygen and fuel availability, and byproduct generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major function of muscle is to produce force. There have been numerous attempts to model muscle force mathematically, ranging from the simplest to the most comprehensive ones that consider many physiological and mechanical factors of the muscle such as muscle length, shortening velocity, neural activation, and muscle architecture (Coggshall and Bekey, 1970;Pell and Stanfield, 1972;Christakos and Lal, 1980;Woittiez et al, 1984;Hannaford, 1990;Schultz et al, 1991;Wexler et al, 1997;Bobet and Stein, 1998;Studer et al, 1999). In most models, muscle force is calculated by summing the forces produced by individual muscle fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%