2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple greedy algorithm for reconstructing pedigrees

Abstract: Citation: Cowell, R. (2013). A simple greedy algorithm for reconstructing pedigrees.Theoretical Population Biology, 83, pp. 55-63. doi: 10.1016Biology, 83, pp. 55-63. doi: 10. /j.tpb.2012 This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent AbstractThis paper introduces a simple greedy-search algorithm for finding high-likelihood pedigrees using micro-satellite (STR) genotype information on a complete sample of related individuals. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likelihood-based approaches to pedigree reconstruction tend to be heuristic and typically deliver a high likelihood, but not necessarily optimal, solution [3,14,45,53]. Approaches that find an overall guaranteed maximum likelihood pedigree are computationally intensive and require either an exhaustive or complete search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood-based approaches to pedigree reconstruction tend to be heuristic and typically deliver a high likelihood, but not necessarily optimal, solution [3,14,45,53]. Approaches that find an overall guaranteed maximum likelihood pedigree are computationally intensive and require either an exhaustive or complete search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would seem in this case that there is an advantage in being able to obtain a truly optimal solution rather than a high likelihood one. Unlike previous work for smaller pedigrees (Cussens et al, 2013;Cowell, 2013), the true pedigree is not found quickly with 15 microsatellite markers and does not typically feature in the top k pedigrees. This is because in this case the true pedigree will generally not have maximum likelihood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Unlike other heuristic likelihood-based approaches (Almudevar, 2003;Riester et al, 2009;Cowell, 2013), the method returns a solution that is guaranteed to have maximal likelihood. Using simulated data, it outperforms other competing approaches for the relatively straightforward situation that is typically considered whereby all individuals have complete data at unlinked markers, founder genotypes are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and transmission of genes from parents to offspring is Mendelian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, many methods have been developed to estimate pedigrees from genetic data. Existing methods fall broadly into two categories: those that estimate pairwise relationships only (Thompson 1975;McPeek and Sun 2000;Smith et al 2001;Sun et al 2001;Milligan 2003;Sun and Dimitromanolakis 2014) and those that aim to reconstruct the entire pedigree (Thomas and Hill 2000;Almudevar 2003;Wang 2004;Hadfield et al 2006;Gasbarra et al 2007;Cowell 2009;Riester et al 2009;Wang and Santure 2009;Kirkpatrick et al 2011;Almudevar and Anderson 2012;Wang 2012;Cowell 2013;He et al 2013;Cussens et al 2013;Staples et al 2014;Anderson and Ng 2016;Staples et al 2016;Ko and Nielsen 2017;Ramstetter et al 2018). Although pairwise methods are computationally fast, estimated pairwise relationships do not necessarily translate to the correct pedigree, as piecing together pairwise relationships may not produce a valid pedigree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%