2009
DOI: 10.1142/s021821650900721x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Formula for the Casson–walker Invariant

Abstract: Gauss diagram formulas are extensively used to study Vassiliev link invariants. Now we apply this approach to invariants of 3-manifolds, considering a manifold as a result M L of surgery on a framed link L in S 3 . We study the lowest degree case -the celebrated Casson-Walker invariant λw of rational homology spheres. This paper is dedicated to a detailed treatment of 2-component links; a general case will be considered in a forthcoming paper. We present simple Gauss diagram formulas for λw(M L ). This enables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then S 3L is a rational homology sphere and λ L (M ) = det L|λ W (M ). One can easily check that (−1) σ−(L) is just the sign of det L, and Theorem 5.1 thus gives us1 2 det Lλ W (S 3 L ) = det L 8 σ(L) + µ 2 (L) − aµ 1 (K 2 ) − bµ 1 (K 1 ) .Using the explicit formulas for µ 1 and µ 2 given in Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6, we then obtain the following formula for det L 2 λ W (M ) − 1 4 σ(L) :ac 2 (L 2 ) + bc 2 (L 1 ) + n 3 − n 12 + (a + b) 24 (2n 2 − ab − 2) − c 3 (L) + n (c 2 (L 1 ) + c 2 (L 2 )) .This recovers a result of S. Matveev et M. Polyak[11, Thm. 6.3].The rest of this section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 5.1.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then S 3L is a rational homology sphere and λ L (M ) = det L|λ W (M ). One can easily check that (−1) σ−(L) is just the sign of det L, and Theorem 5.1 thus gives us1 2 det Lλ W (S 3 L ) = det L 8 σ(L) + µ 2 (L) − aµ 1 (K 2 ) − bµ 1 (K 1 ) .Using the explicit formulas for µ 1 and µ 2 given in Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6, we then obtain the following formula for det L 2 λ W (M ) − 1 4 σ(L) :ac 2 (L 2 ) + bc 2 (L 1 ) + n 3 − n 12 + (a + b) 24 (2n 2 − ab − 2) − c 3 (L) + n (c 2 (L 1 ) + c 2 (L 2 )) .This recovers a result of S. Matveev et M. Polyak[11, Thm. 6.3].The rest of this section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 5.1.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…These two invariants are involved in the case n = 2 of Theorem 1, which recovers a theorem of S. Matveev and M. Polyak [11,Thm. 6.3] for the Casson-Walker invariant of rational homology spheres; see Remark 5.3 for details.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These formulas generalize the calculation of a linking number by counting subdiagrams of special geometric-combinatorial types with signs and weights in a given link diagram. This technique is also very helpful in the rapidly developing field of virtual knot theory (see [12]), as well as in 3-manifold theory (see [17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%