2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple flow-cytometry method to evaluate peripheral blood contamination of bone marrow aspirates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, we describe progressively lower plasma cell content with each pull of bone marrow aspirate. This is consistent with clinical experience and previous studies showing increased hemodilution in later aspirate pulls [32, 33]. Bone marrow aspirates for research are commonly the final pull, and involve a greater volume, typically 10–20 ml.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, we describe progressively lower plasma cell content with each pull of bone marrow aspirate. This is consistent with clinical experience and previous studies showing increased hemodilution in later aspirate pulls [32, 33]. Bone marrow aspirates for research are commonly the final pull, and involve a greater volume, typically 10–20 ml.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Evaluation by flow cytometry is commonly performed on second pull aspirates, which carry a greater risk of hemodilution. At the same time, flow cytometry is well known to underestimate both plasma cell content and total white blood cells, due to various technical factors and properties of the cells [32, 33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, cases where samples had been considered as ‘hemodiluted’ in the laboratory report were excluded from the study. Concerning this topic, although some recommendations have been published, there is no universally accepted consensus about its correct evaluation . As our study was retrospective, there were no uniform criteria used for this evaluation among the participating laboratories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, significantly lower total B-cell and nPC numbers were detected in hemodiluted vs. non-hemodiluted BM samples, at the expense of decreased percentages of both stages I and II BCP and both CD19 + and CD19 − nPC, but with similar numbers of TBC/NBC. Altogether, these results indicate that BM hemodilution is associated with significantly decreased numbers of BM-derived B-cells (e.g., BCP) and nPC due to the very low numbers of both cell populations in (steady-state) adult blood [33,34], independently of the time point at which the sample was obtained during the course of disease therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the impact of hemodilution on the distribution of BM B-cell and PC subsets was investigated in MM and shows that accurate analysis of the distribution of normal/residual B-cells requires the assessment of sample quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%