A simple estimator for the correlated random coefficient model

Blander, Rembert De

doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.11.007

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Failing to account for endogeneity may lead to biased parameter estimates, which undermines the validity of the findings obtained from regression-type analysis of observed data (Sande and Ghosh, 2018). There are a number of approaches used to treat endogeneity problems such as the control variables approach (Germann et al, 2015) and the control function approach (De Blander, 2010). We tested for endogeneity on the latent variable SCRE because it had both direct (BDAC, OMIN) and an indirect predictor (BDAC) using the instrumental variable approach.…”

Section: Structural Model Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain resilience in mindful humanitarian aid organizations: the role of big data analytics

Dennehy

Oredo

Spanaki

et al. 2021

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand the nomological network of associations between collective mindfulness and big data analytics in fostering resilient humanitarian relief supply chains.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conceptualize a research model grounded in literature and test the hypotheses using survey data collected from informants at humanitarian aid organizations in Africa and Europe.FindingsThe findings demonstrate that organizational mindfulness is key to enabling resilient humanitarian relief supply chains, as opposed to just big data analytics.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine organizational mindfulness and big data analytics in the context of humanitarian relief supply chains.

show abstract

Section: Structural Model Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain resilience in mindful humanitarian aid organizations: the role of big data analytics

Dennehy

Oredo

Spanaki

et al. 2021

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Strategic performance effects of misaligned formal contracting: The mediating role of relational contracting

Sande

Haugland

2015

International Journal of Research in Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Authors are permitted to self-archive the peer-reviewed (but not final) version of a contribution on the contributor's personal website, in the contributor's institutional repository or archive, subject to an embargo period of 24 months for social science and humanities (SSH) journals and 12 months for scientific, technical, and medical (STM) journals following publication of the final contribution. Although all errors remain our own, we gratefully acknowledge Robert Dahlstrom, Matilda Dorotic, Mrinal Ghosh, Auke Hunneman, Silja Korhonen-Sande, Rutger van Oest, Peter C. Verhoef, Kenneth H. Wathne, and participants at the 2010 Johan Arndt Conference, the 2010 ISNIE Conference, and two faculty seminars at the Department of Marketing, BI Norwegian Business School, for their constructive and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. This research initially began while the first author was employed at the Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. This research would not have been possible without a generous grant from the Forestry Development Fund of Norway. The authors are indebted to the previous editor, Marnik G. Dekimpe, the current editor, Eitan Muller, the area editor, Sandy D. Jap, and two anonymous reviewers. Highlights: Firms experience significant losses due to misaligned formal contracting. Misalignment matters more for end-product enhancements than for cost reductions. Relational contracting mediates the negative performance effects of misaligned formal contracting. ABSTRACTStudies show that failing to align formal contracts with transaction attributes reduces relationship performance. However, few studies consider either how the effects of misalignment differ across outcome types or the mechanisms through which misalignment affects performance. This study examines the effects of misaligned formal contracting on two types of outcomes, i.e., end-product enhancements and cost reductions, and on one mechanism through which misalignment affects performance, i.e., relational contracting.Using survey data from 305 buyer-supplier relationships in the Scandinavian wood industry, the findings suggest that (1) misalignment has a significantly stronger negative effect on endproduct enhancements than on cost reductions, and (2) relational contracts mediate the effect of misaligned formal contracting on performance. Firms in the sample experience significant misalignment-related losses of 10.3% and 5.3% in end-product enhancements and cost reductions, respectively. The findings suggest that misalignment is particularly harmful to performance outcomes that rely on relational contracting, such as end-product enhancements.

show abstract