2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple embedding method for solving partial differential equations on surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
304
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
304
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been several decades to develop numerical methods for solving PDEs in surfaces. Many methods have been developed, such as surface finite element method [19], level set method [9,48], grid-based particle method [31,32] and closest point method [35,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been several decades to develop numerical methods for solving PDEs in surfaces. Many methods have been developed, such as surface finite element method [19], level set method [9,48], grid-based particle method [31,32] and closest point method [35,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been several decades to develop numerical methods for solving PDEs in surfaces. Many methods have been developed, such as surface finite element method [19], level set method [9,48], grid-based particle method [31,32] and closest point method [35,43].Recently, manifold model attracts more and more attentions in data analysis and image processing [4,11,13,23,26,29,30,36,[40][41][42]47]. In the manifold model, data or images are represented as a point cloud, which is defined as a collection of points that are embedded in a high-dimensional Euclidean space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present a simple illustration of motion by mean curvature as an annealing technique. This is work in progress with Shahriari and Ruuth [64] which numerically addresses (NLCH) and (MCH) on surfaces using the Closest Point Method of Ruuth and Merriman [61]. On any given surface, we combine the time integration of the (MCH) with motion by mean curvature (viewing u as a level set function) to arrive at low energy states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wider stencils, it is necessary to consider one-sided non-oscillatory approximations of the derivatives in order to minimize errors due to differencing over kinks of the distance function. The closest point mapping is used in [22] as an Eulerian method to track interfaces and in [14,20] for solving PDEs on surfaces. In the case that Γ is given as a collection of parameterized patches, one may use the fast algorithm proposed in [23] to compute the closest point mappings.…”
Section: The Implicit Boundary Integral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%