2021
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202007746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Dithieno[3,2‐b:2′,3′‐d]pyrrol‐Rhodanine Molecular Third Component Enables Over 16.7% Efficiency and Stable Organic Solar Cells

Abstract: Organic solar cells (OSCs) can achieve greatly improved power conversion efficiency (PCE) by incorporating suitable additives in active layers. Their structure design often faces the challenge of operation generality for more binary blends. Herein, a simple dithieno[3,2‐b:2′,3′‐d]pyrrole‐rhodanine molecule (DR8) featuring high compatibility with polymer donor PM6 is developed as a cost‐effective third component. By employing classic ITIC‐like ITC6‐4Cl and Y6 as model nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) in PM6‐based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the morphological and charge transport characterizations, we performed CA (Figure S18 and Table S5) measurements for both donor and acceptor materials to analyze their SFE and χ parameters. The CA and SFE values of donors and acceptors and χ values between the donors and acceptors are summarized in Tables S5 and S6, respectively. We then plotted the PCE versus the absolute difference of the total SFE (|ΔSFE d+p |), the polar component (|ΔSFE p |), and dispersion component (|ΔSFE d |), as shown in Figure a–c, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the morphological and charge transport characterizations, we performed CA (Figure S18 and Table S5) measurements for both donor and acceptor materials to analyze their SFE and χ parameters. The CA and SFE values of donors and acceptors and χ values between the donors and acceptors are summarized in Tables S5 and S6, respectively. We then plotted the PCE versus the absolute difference of the total SFE (|ΔSFE d+p |), the polar component (|ΔSFE p |), and dispersion component (|ΔSFE d |), as shown in Figure a–c, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close γ values of PM6 and PM7-Si indicate their good miscibility. Furthermore, the Flory− Huggins interaction parameter (χ) value of the binary blend can be obtained using the formula shown as follows: 57 ( )…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close γ values of PM6 and PM7-Si indicate their good miscibility. Furthermore, the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ) value of the binary blend can be obtained using the formula shown as follows: , where γ A and γ B are the surface energy values of components A and B calculated from the contact angle measurements, respectively. The χ values for PM6:C9 and PM7-Si:C9 are 0.86. and 0.50, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is explained by the larger polarizability of small molecules than polymers, which links to the dispersion component, , whereas the polar component becomes predominant in the polymer:polymer blend. We have also calculated the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ) according to the following equation reported in the previous literature with the SFE values of donor and acceptor components (γ donor and γ acceptor , respectively). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%