2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple cloud-based energy balance model to estimate dew

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
16

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
34
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution was done in accordance with the prevailing wind direction, with two collectors on the east side and two in the middle of the experiment. The leaf wetness duration (LWD) was measured by the "Electronic tree" (MOREIRA et al, 2011;GUEDES et al, 2013), with 12 electronic wetness sensors distributed at three heights (0.3; 0.6, and 0.9 m) representing the crop canopy, and the temperature and relative humidity of the air were measured in the same equipment at a height of 1.70 m. Eight Electronic trees were used in the experiment, one in each plot, to provide better representation and reliability of LWD, since this is a complex measure and depends not only on the weather conditions but also on their interaction with the structure, composition, and physiology of the crop canopy (MAGAREY, 1999;MADEIRA et al, 2002;SENTELHAS et al, 2005;MARTA et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution was done in accordance with the prevailing wind direction, with two collectors on the east side and two in the middle of the experiment. The leaf wetness duration (LWD) was measured by the "Electronic tree" (MOREIRA et al, 2011;GUEDES et al, 2013), with 12 electronic wetness sensors distributed at three heights (0.3; 0.6, and 0.9 m) representing the crop canopy, and the temperature and relative humidity of the air were measured in the same equipment at a height of 1.70 m. Eight Electronic trees were used in the experiment, one in each plot, to provide better representation and reliability of LWD, since this is a complex measure and depends not only on the weather conditions but also on their interaction with the structure, composition, and physiology of the crop canopy (MAGAREY, 1999;MADEIRA et al, 2002;SENTELHAS et al, 2005;MARTA et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zero plane displacement and roughness length depend on plant density [35,41] and leaf area index [42,43] and can therefore differ by ±20% or more from the values we computed. Probably because of these dependencies, a wide range of coefficients is suggested in the literature for the calculation of the zero plane displacement and roughness length as a function of plant height [23,[44][45][46].…”
Section: ∆T ( • C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is based on an energy balance model similar to those in e.g. Nilsson (1996), Madeira et al (2002), Beysens et al (2005), Jacobs et al (2008), Richards (2009) and Maestre-Valero et al (2011), who have demonstrated that their models are able to predict the measured dew yields within reasonable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%