A simple checklist, that is all it takes: a cluster randomized controlled field trial on improving the treatment of suspected terrorists by the police

Abstract

Objectives When it comes to interviewing suspected terrorists, global evidence points to harsh interrogation procedures, despite the likelihood of false positives. How can the state maintain an effective counterterrorism policy while simultaneously protecting civil rights? Until now, the shroud of secrecy of "national security" practices has thwarted attempts by researchers to test apparatuses that engender fair interrogation procedures. The present study aims to test one approach: the use of a "procedural justice checklist" (PJ Checklist) in interviews of suspected terrorists by counterterrorism police officers in port settings. Methods Using a clustered randomized controlled field test in a European democracy, we measure the effect of implementing Procedural Justice (PJ) Checklists in counterterrorism police settings. With 65 teams of officers randomly-assigned into treatment and control conditions, we compare post-interrogation surveys of suspects (n = 1418) on perceptions of legitimacy; obligations to obey the law; willingness to cooperate with the police; effectiveness of counterterrorism measures; distributive justice; feelings of social resistance to the state; and PJ. A series of multi-level linear, logistic, and ordered logit regression models are used to estimate the treatment effect, with Hedges' g and odds ratios used for effect sizes. Results When compared with control conditions, implementing a policy of PJ Checklist causes statistically significant and large enhancement in all measured dimensions, including the willingness of suspects to obey the law (g = 1.022 [0.905, 1.138]), to cooperate with the police (g = 1.118 [0.999, 1.238]), distributive justice (g = 0.993 [0.880, 1.106]), effectiveness (g = 1.077 [0.959, 1.195]), procedural justice (g = 1.044 [0.930, 1.158]), and feelings of resistance towards the state (g = − 0.370 [− 0.259, − 0.482]).

“How Should the Police Let Victims Down?” The Impact of Reassurance Call-Backs by Local Police Officers to Victims of Vehicle and Cycle Crimes: A Block Randomized Controlled Trial

“…As this study shows, police call backs as opposed to the standard care would be an improved level of service, which would potentially increase future cooperation. At the same time, we did not follow up on our treatment victims to understand whether they do engage with the police again more than control participants – a common limitation in experiments of this nature (see Langley et al, 2021).…”

“…It then follows that the satisfaction of victims who report crime is shaped by the reporting and subsequent investigation process; however, there is a demonstrated link between victim-initiated contact and dissatisfaction with law enforcement (Bradford, 2010;Jackson et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2019). The magnitude of this dissatisfaction is dependent on the services that officers provide (Jackson et al, 2012) and the manner in which they treat citizens (Bradford, 2010;Bradford et al, 2009;Langley et al, 2021;Laxminarayan et al, 2013;Tankebe, 2009).…”

Reflections on applying behavioural insights to crime: a guide for behavioural scientists and criminologists in search of policy unicorns

“…This has created fertile ground for testing new approaches in policing, including behaviourally informed interventions. For example, in a cluster RCT with 65 teams of counter-terrorism officers at borders, Langley et al (2021) found that the use of a checklist significantly increased suspects' perceptions of police legitimacy along several dimensions.…”

The police and those policed as intergroup par excellence: Current trends and future prospects

“…These include improvements in police attitudes and behaviors, as well as public perceptions of the police (Antrobus et al, 2019;Rosenbaum & Lawrence, 2017;Skogan et al, 2015;Weisburd et al, 2022;Wood et al, 2020). Finally, randomized field trials have tested the effects of procedural justice interventions carried out by police officers during two types of encounters: traffic stops (Mazerolle et al, 2012(Mazerolle et al, , 2013Sahin et al, 2017), and interrogations of terrorism suspects (Langley et al, 2021). These studies showed that procedural justice interventions were associated with a variety of advantageous effects on attitudes and behavioral intentions.…”