1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(98)00365-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple bijection for the regions of the Shi arrangement of hyperplanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also show up in real hyperplane arrangements, Prüfer codes, quasisymmetric functions, and Hopf algebras, but detailing all of these connections would lead us too far afield. (see [1], [4], [5], [6], [8], [24], [46], [47], or [45] for details.) We conclude with one final illustration: the associahedron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also show up in real hyperplane arrangements, Prüfer codes, quasisymmetric functions, and Hopf algebras, but detailing all of these connections would lead us too far afield. (see [1], [4], [5], [6], [8], [24], [46], [47], or [45] for details.) We conclude with one final illustration: the associahedron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The admissible sign types and some of its subfamilies were enumerated in all the cases (see [9,10,12]). Recently the sign types indexed by the root system of type A l have been studying extensively as hyperplane arrangements by quite a number of people (see [2,3,6,7,14,15]). …”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When I= [1,2,3], we arrange the entries of the upperunitriangular part of an I-sign type X in the following way.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geometrically, permutations correspond to chambers of the Coxeter arrangement of type A n−1 , while parking functions label those of the Shi arrangement [2]. But this is not the only possible explanation (see, e.g., [20]), and our choice was rather dictated by elementary combinatorial considerations (see Appendix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%