2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple augmented ∊-constraint method for multi-objective mathematical integer programming problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently several prodedures have been described in literature to generate efficient solutions of integer programming problems for a larger number of objectives where all coefficients have integer values (or can be transformed to them), see Lokman and Köksalan [2013], Mavrotas and Florios [2013], Ozlen et al [2014], Zhang and Reimann [2014]. In the problem we consider this is not necessarily the case.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently several prodedures have been described in literature to generate efficient solutions of integer programming problems for a larger number of objectives where all coefficients have integer values (or can be transformed to them), see Lokman and Köksalan [2013], Mavrotas and Florios [2013], Ozlen et al [2014], Zhang and Reimann [2014]. In the problem we consider this is not necessarily the case.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Needless to say that this target requires far less steps from an optimization problem that does not increase in size. Mavrotas and Florios [2013] and [Zhang and Reimann, 2014] elaborate further on the augmented -contraint method that is designed to deal with many objectives in an integer programming environment. Essential is the idea that the problem is converted in a problem with integer coefficients, such that the step sizes can be taken as one.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, despite its advantages, the ε-constraint method has also some weaknesses that have been addressed in the literature (Mavrotas, 2009;Zhang & Reimann, 2014). Among them we can cite the generation of dominated solutions.…”
Section: Multi-objective Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wastes time and computational effort. Because of this problem, some authors have proposed modifications in order to overcome it, like in Zhang and Reimann (2014) or in Mavrotas (2009). The former method, called the augmented ε-constraint method (AUGMECON), which was later improved in Mavrotas and Florios (2013), is the one that we will use in this paper.…”
Section: Multi-objective Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the cost of running multiple executions for the related single-objective problem treated is not elevated, since the algorithm proposed is significantly fast although a mutiobjective extension of the methodology will be investigated in the future introducing specific constructive and local searches for each of the objectives. Other improved -constraint methods especially suitable for Multiobjective Integer Programming (MOIP) problems have been proposed in [18][19][20].…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%