1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100086692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple apparatus for the assessment of Eustachian tube patency before myringoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study post-operatively we found the graft success rate was 96% among patients with normal ET function, whereas it was 83% in partial dysfunction of ET and 64% in total ET dysfunction and so we found a statistical significant association between the ET function and the tympanoplasty success rate and a similar type of findings was also quoted by Holmquist et al, Mackinnon et al, Moustafa et al 16,21,22 These studies had been conducted more than 3 decades ago but even the recent studies done by Shiromany and Belaldavar et al, Prasad et al had also mentioned a similar percentage of success and failure rates. 12,14 Few other controversial results were also observed in few studies done by Sheehy and Glasscock, Sharp, Ekvall, Bluestone, Anderson where they observed a poor association between Eustachian tube function and Tympanoplasty results in which they found more than 70% success rate in patients with poor tubal function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study post-operatively we found the graft success rate was 96% among patients with normal ET function, whereas it was 83% in partial dysfunction of ET and 64% in total ET dysfunction and so we found a statistical significant association between the ET function and the tympanoplasty success rate and a similar type of findings was also quoted by Holmquist et al, Mackinnon et al, Moustafa et al 16,21,22 These studies had been conducted more than 3 decades ago but even the recent studies done by Shiromany and Belaldavar et al, Prasad et al had also mentioned a similar percentage of success and failure rates. 12,14 Few other controversial results were also observed in few studies done by Sheehy and Glasscock, Sharp, Ekvall, Bluestone, Anderson where they observed a poor association between Eustachian tube function and Tympanoplasty results in which they found more than 70% success rate in patients with poor tubal function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results of present study are comparable with Mackinnon (19) who observed 81% success rate in patients with normal ETF and 40% in patients with impaired ETF. Study results were compared with other studies in table No 3 (20)(21)(22)(23)(24). After applying the tests of significance it was found that there is no significant association between Eustachian tube function and successful graft take up (P > 0.05).…”
Section: Role Of Impedance Audiometry In Evaluation Of Eustachian Tubmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The major cause of abnormal tubal function appears to be obstruction which is either mechanical or functional. Manometry (Miller, 1965;Bluestone etal., 1972;Moustafa et al, 1979;Cantekin et al, 1979), radiography (Ferber and Holmquist, 1973), fluorescein (Rogers et al, 1962) and radioisotope studies (Lafaye et al, 1974) have been used to diagnose tubal obstruction. Whenever the tubal obstruction was diagnosed and the aetiology was obscure, it was considered as functional or idiopathic (Bluestone, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%