2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and sensitive UFLC-fluorescence method for endocrine disrupters determination in marine waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is important to point out that most of the works have employed 230 nm as excitation wavelength 29,33,37 which has a suitable response to river and drinking water samples. Nonetheless, wastewater samples showed high interference on fluorescence signal at 230 nm (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it is important to point out that most of the works have employed 230 nm as excitation wavelength 29,33,37 which has a suitable response to river and drinking water samples. Nonetheless, wastewater samples showed high interference on fluorescence signal at 230 nm (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that, these instruments are expensive and require high investment costs for their maintenance. 29 High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV (HPLC-UV) [30][31][32] and fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) 26,29,[33][34][35] have been reported as low-cost alternatives to HPLC-MS analysis, used to determine estrogens with quantification limits compatible with the concentration of estrogens in wastewater and natural waters. Lopes et al 36 showed the determination of E1 and E2 by SPE-HPLC-FLD in natural (600 ng L -1 of E1 in surface water, 6 ng L -1 of E2 in river spring) and treated waters (6.8 ng L -1 of E2) in São Paulo (Brazil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R 2 was 0.9980, it is assumed that an ideal data fit was achieved whenever R 2 was equal to or greater than 0.99 (Lisboa et al 2013). The limit of detection (LOD), defined as LOD ¼ 3S B =m, where S B and m are the standard deviation of the blank and the slope of the calibration graph, respectively, was 0.072 mg Á mL À1 .…”
Section: Gold(iii) By Ionic Liquid Extraction and Faas 1057mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the emerging contaminants, a number of compounds have been receiving special attention from the scientific community, due to their potential capacity of interfering with the functioning of the endocrine system of organisms. The literature uses several names for these compounds: xenobiotics, pseudo-estrogens, pseudo-androgens, endocrine disruptors (ED), and interfering endocrines (Lisboa et al, 2013;Menzies et al, 2013;Grassi et al, 2013;Ghiselli & Jardim, 2007;Lathers, 2002;Kardinaal et al, 1997). Many of them are not degraded or broken down by any biochemical and/or natural photochemical pathways and may also undergo bioaccumulation and/or biomagnification (Colin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%