1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00893.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and Reliable Method of Scoring the Thurstone Attitude Scales

Abstract: A simple method of scoring the Thurstone Attitude Scales is presented, which does not involve the use of a judging group and yet is found in several samples to be consistently more reliable than the original method of scoring. The scores obtained by the two methods correlate highly (median r= .88), indicating that they are measuring essentially the same thing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions on the parent interview form related to the symptom status of the child, the medicines prescribed, the use of healthcare services for asthma in the previous 12 months (ED visits, hospitalizations, physician office visits). The parents' observations and opinions of the physicians' teaching and communication behaviour, and other aspects of the clinician-patient interaction comprised items assessed by use of a five-point Likert scale [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions on the parent interview form related to the symptom status of the child, the medicines prescribed, the use of healthcare services for asthma in the previous 12 months (ED visits, hospitalizations, physician office visits). The parents' observations and opinions of the physicians' teaching and communication behaviour, and other aspects of the clinician-patient interaction comprised items assessed by use of a five-point Likert scale [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows avoiding the inaccuracies sometimes seen in Likert scales ROSLOW;MURPHY, 1993) used by the authors, as shown in the two examples shown below: In the first example, the position undecided does not contain an intensity position: it actually means a refusal of expressing a position; it is away of expressing frequency reasoning. The second example contains three positions out of the pretended scale: agree and disagree express the qualitative meaning of the position, but do not indicate its quantitative meaning; and the word neutral is even more explicitly away from the scale than undecided: they are expressions out of a scaling reasoning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBTI personality test was applied to managers of a fi nance company who were then asked to participate in our survey, which consisted of two sections. The fi rst section of the questionnaire includes 9 items on a 5-point Likert scale for data collection, with ''1'' as ''strongly disagree" and ''5'' as ''strongly agree'' (Likert, 1934), to measure dissatisfi ed complaint actions at the levels of no action, public and private actions. The second section includes questions regarding the demographic profi les (age, education level, income and gender) of the respondents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%