2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and rapid method for electromagnetic field distortion correction when using two Fastrak sensors for biomechanical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While magnetic tracking has advantages such as low system cost [13] and operation under conditions with occluded line-of-sight, the Fastrak system suffers from inaccuracies in the presence of magnetic field distortions, e.g., from metal. Distortions may be identified and corrected for by time-consuming on-site calibration (the calibration object must be sampled at, e.g., 24 positions [10] or moved through the measurement space for approximately 3 min [13]). Nevertheless, after these corrections, errors still exceed 10 mm for distances between sensor and emitter of beyond 1.20 m [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While magnetic tracking has advantages such as low system cost [13] and operation under conditions with occluded line-of-sight, the Fastrak system suffers from inaccuracies in the presence of magnetic field distortions, e.g., from metal. Distortions may be identified and corrected for by time-consuming on-site calibration (the calibration object must be sampled at, e.g., 24 positions [10] or moved through the measurement space for approximately 3 min [13]). Nevertheless, after these corrections, errors still exceed 10 mm for distances between sensor and emitter of beyond 1.20 m [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor PnO during the data collection process is determined through application of the estimated sensor 0 PnO to the relative PnO developed in (16) and (17). The position of sensor n at time step k is the relative position of sensor n (rP n ) rotated by the sensor 0 orientation, i.e., QtoT(q 0 k ), summed with the sensor 0 position r 0 k (18).…”
Section: B Mapping Fixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagemeister et al [16] used multiple sensors in a known geometry to measure errors for real-time PnO corrections. Their technique generated correction factors by comparing the known distance between sensors with the measurements to correct PnO by more than 50% without a formal mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some applications, electromagnetic (EM) motion capture sensors 1 are a practical alternative to the more commonly used optoelectronic (OE) sensors. Although EM sensors have some disadvantages [1], including a small sensing volume [2] (a sphere with radius on the order of 4ft) and susceptibility to electromagnetic interference from ferromagnetic materials [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and electrical equipment [8], they have some advantages over optoelectronic sensors. EM sensors: do not require a direct line of sight; output six degrees of freedom per sensor; sample at relatively high frequencies (between 40 and 360 samples/s); and are relatively low-cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%