2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and inexpensive light source for research in visual neuroscience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LEDs are more common, low cost, easily portable, have low power consumption and provide flexible means to customise a visual stimulus [52][53][54]. LED stimulus has the advantage of generating the required colour using RGB LEDs in the same source thus avoiding the issues in attention shifts [50].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEDs are more common, low cost, easily portable, have low power consumption and provide flexible means to customise a visual stimulus [52][53][54]. LED stimulus has the advantage of generating the required colour using RGB LEDs in the same source thus avoiding the issues in attention shifts [50].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have become more and more common as a low-cost and flexible way to provide light stimuli in vision research (Nygaard and Frumkes, 1982;Scholfield and Murdock, 1987;Watanabe et al, 1992;Pokorny et al, 2004;Fadda and Falsini, 1997;Demontis et al, 2005;da Silva Pinto et al, 2011;Rogers et al, 2012). LEDs offer easier and more versatile control of light characteristics (Schubert and Kim, 2005) compared to traditional light sources such as xenon, mercury, metal halide and halogen lamps which often require various auxiliary devices in experimental settings such as a set of filters for spectral tuning and shutters to control exposure duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widespread use of LEDs in scientific research, there is only a handful of papers dedicated for the design of LED stimulators for research purposes (Watanabe et al, 1992;Pokorny et al, 2004;Fadda and Falsini, 1997;Demontis et al, 2005;Nishimura et al, 2006;Albeanu et al, 2008;da Silva Pinto et al, 2011;Rogers et al, 2012). Additionally, the existing approaches have relied on either off-the-shelf proprietary laboratory equipment (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many solutions have in fact been developed to circumvent such problems while making LEDs display time-varying stimuli such as brief flashes, flickers and more complex temporal waveforms (e.g. Nygaard and Frumkes, 1982;Swanson et al, 1987;Watanabe et al, 1992;Falsini, 1996, 1997;Demontis et al, 2005;Hogg, 2006). Although such solutions rely on relatively simple electronics, they are often coupled with off-the-shelf proprietary laboratory equipments like waveform generators, which brings a number of disadvantages: it raises the price of the stimulation device, especially if several channels need to be driven simultaneously; it diminishes the flexibility and user-friendliness generally associated with software-based solutions; it depends on electrical line power, thereby offering little portability to the system; and finally, it relies on equipments which, for being effectively black-boxes, limit the scalability of the project development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%